Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Amova Core Equity FundvsTAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 7 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 25.5% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

25.5%
Shared holdingAmova CoreTAHITO TeMin weight
Meridian Energy6.59%8.28%6.59%
Spark New Zealand4.99%6.68%4.99%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare16.09%4.33%4.33%
Ebos4.72%3.55%3.55%
Summerset Group3.43%3.90%3.43%
Chorus1.81%3.73%1.81%
INGENIA COMMUNITIES GROUP0.80%1.73%0.80%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Amova Core Equity Fund

TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment philosophy and resulting portfolio construction. TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund is managed according to a kaupapa Māori framework, applying indigenous values-based screening to stock selection — a methodology distinct from the Amova Core Equity Fund, which applies no such disclosed screening criteria. Both sit in the Australasian Equities category with identical growth asset allocations of 98.31% and a risk indicator of 5 out of 7.

Fee levels differ meaningfully: Amova discloses an annual fund charge of 0.95%, while TAHITO discloses 1.26% — a 31 basis point gap that compounds over time. On the five-year return figure disclosed in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update, TAHITO shows 1.77% per annum against Amova's 0.35%, though these figures reflect past performance and the periods or methodologies underlying each calculation should be verified independently before drawing conclusions.

Portfolio concentration also diverges. Amova's top five holdings account for roughly 51% of the fund, led by Fisher & Paykel Healthcare at 16.09%, indicating a more concentrated large-cap Australasian tilt. TAHITO's top five represent approximately 31%, with no single holding above 8.28%, suggesting broader diversification across its screened universe. Fund sizes are comparable — Amova at NZD 22.6 million and TAHITO at NZD 26.9 million.

Investors should verify all figures, including the applicable fee structures and return calculation periods, against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Amova Core Equity Fund charges 0.31% lower in annual fund charges (0.95% vs 1.26%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

0.95%

Lower half of cohort

TAHITO

1.26%

Highest 15% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

0.35%

Lower half over 5 years

TAHITO

1.77%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$23m

Lower half by size

TAHITO

NZ$27m

Lower half by size

MetricAmovaTAHITOLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.95%1.26%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)55Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.0.35%1.77%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$23mNZ$27mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoYesSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Core Equity Fund

The fund aims to outperform the S&P/NZX 50 Index Gross (with Imputation Credits) by 3.00% p.A. Over a rolling three year period before fees, expenses and taxes. This fund aims to provide investors with an exposure to New Zealand and Australian equity markets from an actively managed investment portfolio with potential for growth of income and capital.
Full Amova Amova Core Equity Fund profile →

TAHITO

TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund

The Fund is an indigenous ethical and sustainable fund. The Fund Uses positive Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) integrated screens in selecting investments. Māori indigenous values and principles serve as the foundation to the Fund’s philosophy and investment selection process. The Fund will provide actively managed exposure to a portfolio of primarily New Zealand and Australian companies that have been selected in accordance with the TAHITO investment philosophy. The Fund aims to generate a better return than the benchmark over the medium to long term.
Full TAHITO TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Core Equity Fund and the TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Amova Core Equity Fund charges 0.31% lower in annual fund charges (0.95% vs 1.26%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Core Equity Fund or TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund?
Amova Core Equity Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.95% p.a. vs 1.26% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Amova Core Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.35% and TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund's is 1.77% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — TAHITO Te Tai o Rehua Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Amova Core Equity Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.