Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

AMP Balanced Managed Fund vs Foundation Series Balanced Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their fee level. The Foundation Series Balanced Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 0.36%, compared with 0.81% for the AMP Balanced Managed Fund — a gap of 45 basis points that, compounded over time, can materially affect net returns. Both funds sit at risk indicator 4 on the standardised 1–7 scale and share an identical growth assets allocation of 53.15%, placing them in the same diversified, balanced risk band despite their different fee structures.

Portfolio construction diverges significantly. Foundation Series concentrates exposure through five ETF and fund-of-fund wrappers — the two largest being the Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF (29.5%) and the iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF (26.5%) — giving it an explicit ESG tilt and a highly concentrated top-five. AMP's top holdings are individual securities and NZ Government inflation-linked bonds, with no single position exceeding 2.01%, suggesting a more broadly distributed underlying portfolio.

On five-year returns, Foundation Series reports 4.77% per annum; this data point is absent from AMP's latest quarterly fund update in this snapshot, so no direct return comparison can be made. Fund size is broadly comparable: AMP at NZD 44.6 million and Foundation Series at NZD 45.5 million.

Both are retail managed fund investments, not KiwiSaver scheme accounts. Always verify fees, returns, and portfolio data against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any figures here.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Foundation Series Balanced Fund charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 0.81%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

AMP

0.81%

Lower half of cohort

Foundation Series

0.36%

Lowest 14% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

AMP

Foundation Series

4.77%

Top 25% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

AMP

NZ$45m

Lower half by size

Foundation Series

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Metric AMP Foundation Series Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.81% 0.36% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 4.77% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$45m NZ$46m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 53% / 47% 53% / 47% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

AMP

AMP Balanced Managed Fund

The fund has a well-diversified portfolio that has a balance of risk through holding growth assets and an allocation to lower-risk income assets. The fund aims to achieve medium returns, in exchange there will be some movements up and down in the value of your investments.
Full AMP AMP Balanced Managed Fund profile →

Foundation Series

Foundation Series Balanced Fund

Aims for mid-range long-run returns by investing in a diversified portfolio with a balance of income and growth assets. The Fund incorporates certain responsible investment considerations and is exposed to investment strategies that seek to limit exposure to companies involved in specific business practices.
Full Foundation Series Foundation Series Balanced Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the AMP Balanced Managed Fund and the Foundation Series Balanced Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Foundation Series Balanced Fund charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 0.81%).
Which fund has lower fees, AMP Balanced Managed Fund or Foundation Series Balanced Fund?
Foundation Series Balanced Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.36% p.a. vs 0.81% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.