Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund vs Mint Diversified Growth Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is risk profile. Despite sharing an identical growth-asset allocation of 78.48%, the Mint Diversified Growth Fund carries a risk indicator of 5, one band higher than the ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund's risk indicator of 4. This divergence likely reflects differences in volatility of underlying holdings or portfolio construction rather than the headline growth-asset percentage alone.

On fees, Mint charges 1.21% per annum against ANZ's 0.95%, a 26-basis-point gap that compounds over time. Over the five-year period disclosed in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update, ANZ returned 3.69% per annum versus Mint's 2.43% — though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns, and the two periods may not align precisely. Fund sizes are comparable: Mint at approximately NZD 45.9 million and ANZ at approximately NZD 45.6 million.

Portfolio construction differs notably. ANZ holds individual global equities directly at the fund level, with Nvidia, Apple, and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare as its largest single-stock positions. Mint's largest holding is its own Mint Australasian Equity Fund at 13.97%, a fund-of-funds structure that layers internal strategies including an Australasian property fund before reaching individual securities such as Visa and Nvidia. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided, though both appear on the Sorted Smart Investor tool.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (0.95% vs 1.21%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

ANZ Investments

0.95%

Lower half of cohort

Mint

1.21%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

ANZ Investments

3.69%

Upper half over 5 years

Mint

2.43%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

ANZ Investments

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Mint

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Metric ANZ Investments Mint Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.95% 1.21% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 3.69% 2.43% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$46m NZ$46m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 78% / 22% 78% / 22% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

3

of each fund's top 10

ANZ Investments weight in shared

3.3%

of ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Mint weight in shared

6.0%

of Mint Diversified Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Holding ANZ Investments Mint
Nvidia Corporation Nvidia Corporation US
1.66% 2.22%
Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Corporation US
0.93% 1.92%
Amazon Com Inc Amazon Com Inc US
0.72% 1.88%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

ANZ Investments

ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund

The Balanced Growth Fund invests mainly in growth assets (equities, listed property and listed infrastructure), with some exposure to income assets (cash and cash equivalents and fixed interest). The fund may also invest in alternative assets.The Balanced Growth Fund aims to achieve (after the fund charge and before tax) over the long-term moderate to high returns, allowing for moderate to large ups and downs in value.
Full ANZ Investments ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund profile →

Mint

Mint Diversified Growth Fund

The Fund invests across a range of asset types which includes New Zealand and international equities (including listed property if held), but will also hold cash and fixed interest. The objective of the Fund is to deliver returns in excess of the Consumers Price Index (CPI) by 4.5% per annum, before fees, over the medium to long term. The relevant market index for the Fund is a composite index derived from the underlying asset classes of the Fund.
Full Mint Mint Diversified Growth Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund and the Mint Diversified Growth Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (0.95% vs 1.21%).
Which fund has lower fees, ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund or Mint Diversified Growth Fund?
ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.95% p.a. vs 1.21% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
ANZ Investments OneAnswer Balanced Growth Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.69% and Mint Diversified Growth Fund's is 2.43% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.