Fund-vs-fund · Diversified
Booster Shielded Growth Fund vs SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy
Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is their asset allocation. The Booster Shielded Growth Fund holds 98.37% in growth assets, making it functionally an equity-heavy portfolio despite its "Diversified" category label. The SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy holds 53.2% in growth assets, sitting closer to a traditional balanced split. Both carry a risk indicator of 4 out of 7, though investors should weigh whether that shared rating adequately reflects the gap in growth asset exposure.
On fees, Booster charges 1.41% per annum against SBS Wealth's 1.03%, a difference of 38 basis points that compounds materially over time. Booster discloses a five-year return of 5.13% per annum; SBS Wealth's five-year return figure is not available in the current snapshot, so a like-for-like performance comparison cannot be made here.
Portfolio construction also differs significantly. Booster's top holdings are individual equities and a Vanguard ESG ETF, with Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and NVIDIA each near 2.7–2.9%. SBS Wealth builds primarily through third-party managed funds — Dimensional and Harbour strategies dominate — and its top five holdings are all fixed interest or diversified fund vehicles, consistent with its lower growth weighting. SBS Wealth is slightly larger by funds under management (approximately NZD 17.1 million versus NZD 14.6 million), though both are relatively small funds. Note that Booster's PDS is linked to a KiwiSaver scheme account structure; investors should confirm which vehicle applies to their situation.
Always verify fees, returns, and asset allocation against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this.
Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.
What's different at a glance
- SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy charges 0.38% lower in annual fund charges (1.03% vs 1.41%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Booster
1.41%
Highest 10% of cohort
SBS Wealth
1.03%
Upper half of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Booster
5.13%
Top 20% over 5 years
SBS Wealth
—
—
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Booster
NZ$15m
Lower half by size
SBS Wealth
NZ$17m
Lower half by size
| Metric | Booster | SBS Wealth | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 1.41% | 1.03% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 4 | 4 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 5.13% | — | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$15m | NZ$17m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 98% / 2% | 53% / 47% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
1
of each fund's top 10
Booster weight in shared
2.4%
of Booster Shielded Growth Fund top 10 is shared
SBS Wealth weight in shared
3.9%
of SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy top 10 is shared
| Holding | Booster | SBS Wealth |
|---|---|---|
| NC NZ Cash (BNZ Bank Trust Account) NZ | 2.40% | 3.93% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
Booster
Booster Shielded Growth Fund
The Shielded Growth Fund is suited to investors who seek potentially relatively high returns over longer term periods (seven years plus), allowing for short to medium term ups and downs, whilst partially shielding the fund against some of the more significant short-term risks. We aim to achieve this by investing predominantly in growth assets, with little or no allocation to income assets.Full Booster Booster Shielded Growth Fund profile →
SBS Wealth
SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy
The Strategy aims to achieve medium capital growth and returns over the medium to long term, with an emphasis on balancing capital growth with stable returns. The Strategy invests into the following SBS Wealth funds: 45% into the World Equity Portfolio; 15% into the Australasian Equity Portfolio; 25% into the World Bond Portfolio; and 15% into the New Zealand Bond Portfolio.Full SBS Wealth SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy profile →
Common questions
What's the difference between the Booster Shielded Growth Fund and the SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy?
Which fund has lower fees, Booster Shielded Growth Fund or SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy?
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
