Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund vs Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

What's different at a glance

  • Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund charges 0.13% lower in annual fund charges (1.18% vs 1.31%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Castle Point

1.18%

Upper half of cohort

Pathfinder

1.31%

Highest 22% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Castle Point

3.85%

Upper half over 5 years

Pathfinder

4.82%

Top 23% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Castle Point

NZ$79m

Upper half by size

Pathfinder

NZ$98m

Upper half by size

Metric Castle Point Pathfinder Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.18% 1.31% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 3.85% 4.82% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$79m NZ$98m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 53% / 47% 78% / 22% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

2

of each fund's top 10

Castle Point weight in shared

2.7%

of Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund top 10 is shared

Pathfinder weight in shared

3.2%

of Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Castle Point Pathfinder
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd NZ
1.57% 2.06%
Infratil Ltd Infratil Ltd NZ
1.13% 1.16%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Castle Point

Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund

The Fund is a globally diversified fund that provides a moderate exposure to growth assets. The Fund invests in a mix of directly owned assets, other Castle Point funds and selected third-party funds. The Fund is designed to generate returns, with the objective of outperforming the NZ Official Cash Rate +3% over the medium term (after fees but before tax), with some risk mitigation tools to smoothen the ride.
Full Castle Point Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund profile →

Pathfinder

Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund

An ethical portfolio invested in growth and income assets.
Full Pathfinder Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund and the Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund charges 0.13% lower in annual fund charges (1.18% vs 1.31%).
Which fund has lower fees, Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund or Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund?
Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.18% p.a. vs 1.31% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.85% and Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund's is 4.82% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Pathfinder Ethical Growth Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Castle Point 5 Oceans Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.