Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund vs Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two Fisher Funds offerings is cost: the Trans Tasman Equity Trust charges an annual fund fee of 1.63%, nearly double the Australian Growth Fund's 0.87%. Over a multi-year holding period, that 0.76 percentage point gap compounds meaningfully against net returns, and the five-year return figures reflect this — the Australian Growth Fund returned 5.32% per annum versus 2.21% for the Trans Tasman Equity Trust over the same period, though past returns do not predict future performance and the two portfolios hold different underlying stocks.

Both funds sit at risk indicator 5 on the standard 1–7 scale and allocate virtually identical proportions to growth assets (98.31% each), so the risk profile and asset-class positioning are structurally alike. Fund size is comparable — NZD 96.2 million versus NZD 104.8 million — suggesting neither fund faces obvious liquidity concerns at this snapshot.

The portfolios diverge in geographic and stock emphasis despite sharing the Australasian Equities category. The Australian Growth Fund's five largest holdings are entirely ASX-listed names — WiseTech Global, CSL, Macquarie Group, BHP, and Car Group — reflecting a concentrated Australian mandate. The Trans Tasman Equity Trust's top positions include NZX-listed Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Xero, Infratil, Mainfreight, and Summerset, signalling a broader trans-Tasman reach with notable New Zealand exposure. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product under these particular offer structures, though both are managed by Fisher Funds.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund charges 0.76% lower in annual fund charges (0.87% vs 1.63%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Fisher Funds

0.87%

Lower half of cohort

Fisher Funds

1.63%

Highest 4% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Fisher Funds

1.31%

Lower half over 5 years

Fisher Funds

0.55%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Fisher Funds

NZ$77m

Upper half by size

Fisher Funds

NZ$65m

Lower half by size

Metric Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.87% 1.63% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 1.31% 0.55% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$77m NZ$65m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

2

of each fund's top 10

Fisher Funds weight in shared

13.7%

of Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Fisher Funds weight in shared

7.0%

of Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust top 10 is shared

Holding Fisher Funds Fisher Funds
BHP Group Limited BHP Group Limited AU
8.87% 4.35%
Commonwealth Bank Ord Commonwealth Bank Ord AU
4.83% 2.66%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund

The fund focuses on growth of your investment over the long term by investing in quality Australian companies which can consistently produce increasing earnings
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust

The fund focuses on growth of your investment over the long term by investing in Australasian companies
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund and the Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund charges 0.76% lower in annual fund charges (0.87% vs 1.63%).
Which fund has lower fees, Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund or Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust?
Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.87% p.a. vs 1.63% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Fisher Funds Australian Growth Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 1.31% and Fisher Funds Trans Tasman Equity Trust's is 0.55% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.