Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Fisher Funds Growth Fund vs QuayStreet Income Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is portfolio composition. Fisher Funds Growth Fund allocates 78.34% of its portfolio to growth assets, with top holdings spanning NZ equities such as Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and Infratil alongside global names like Microsoft and Xero. QuayStreet Income Fund, despite sharing the "Diversified" category label, holds just 0.13% in growth assets; its portfolio is overwhelmingly fixed income, led by NZ government inflation-linked bonds, bank subordinated notes, and corporate debt. This near-total divergence in asset mix sits beneath an identical category classification and is the primary driver of the other differences between the two funds.

Risk follows asset mix: Fisher Funds Growth Fund carries a risk indicator of 4, QuayStreet Income Fund a 3, on the standard seven-point scale. The five-year return differential reflects this — 4.95% per annum versus 2.90% — though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance and the period covered may differ between the two QFUs. On fees, QuayStreet charges 0.77% annually versus Fisher Funds Growth Fund's 1.46%, a difference of 69 basis points. Fund sizes are broadly comparable at roughly $348 million and $329 million respectively. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account offering based on the data provided here.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • QuayStreet Income Fund charges 0.69% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 1.46%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Fisher Funds

1.46%

Highest 8% of cohort

QuayStreet

0.77%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Fisher Funds

3.05%

Lower half over 5 years

QuayStreet

2.90%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Fisher Funds

NZ$319m

Upper half by size

QuayStreet

NZ$329m

Largest 25% in cohort

Metric Fisher Funds QuayStreet Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.46% 0.77% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 3.05% 2.90% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$319m NZ$329m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 78% / 22% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Growth Fund

The fund aims to grow your investment over the long term by investing in mainly growth assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Growth Fund profile →

QuayStreet

QuayStreet Income Fund

The QuayStreet Income Fund will invest in a diversified portfolio with an emphasis on income producing assets such as New Zealand and International fixed interest investments and derivatives. The fund may include an allocation to growth assets. The investment objective is to provide a level of return above the fund’s benchmark over the long term. The fund aims to make quarterly distributions.
Full QuayStreet QuayStreet Income Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Fisher Funds Growth Fund and the QuayStreet Income Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. QuayStreet Income Fund charges 0.69% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 1.46%).
Which fund has lower fees, Fisher Funds Growth Fund or QuayStreet Income Fund?
QuayStreet Income Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.77% p.a. vs 1.46% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Fisher Funds Growth Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.05% and QuayStreet Income Fund's is 2.90% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.