ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International FI

Fisher Funds Income Fund vs SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio

Both are International FI funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is how they build their fixed income exposure. Fisher Funds Income Fund holds a portfolio of individual bonds and cash accounts directly — its top five positions include NZ Local Government Funding Agency notes, Westpac NZ bonds, and TR Group Limited paper, each representing modest single-digit weights. SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio takes a fund-of-funds approach, with roughly 95% of disclosed assets sitting in four collective vehicles, the largest being the iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF NZD Hedged at 44.62%. This structural distinction has meaningful implications for currency hedging, ESG screening, and underlying credit diversification that investors would need to examine in each fund's SIPO and PDS.

Both funds share a risk indicator of 3 and sit in the International Fixed Income category. Their sizes are comparable — Fisher Funds at approximately NZD 43.3 million, SBS Wealth at approximately NZD 45.6 million. Fisher Funds discloses a higher annual fund charge of 0.99% versus SBS Wealth's 0.77%. On five-year returns, Fisher Funds Income Fund returned 2.09% per annum against SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio's 0.32%, though past returns are not a reliable indicator of future performance. Growth asset allocation is minimal for both: 0.13% for Fisher Funds and 0.07% for SBS Wealth. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided.

Always verify these figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on them.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio charges 0.22% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 0.99%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 31 international fi funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Fisher Funds

0.99%

Highest 18% of cohort

SBS Wealth

0.77%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Fisher Funds

2.20%

Top 10% over 5 years

SBS Wealth

0.32%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Fisher Funds

NZ$42m

Lower half by size

SBS Wealth

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Metric Fisher Funds SBS Wealth Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.99% 0.77% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.20% 0.32% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$42m NZ$46m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via InvestNow · Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Income Fund

The fund aims to provide stable returns over the long term by investing in New Zealand and international fixed interest assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Income Fund profile →

SBS Wealth

SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio

The Fund aims to provide investors with a broadly diversified portfolio of international investment grade income securities primarily through a large pool of offshore income producing investments.
Full SBS Wealth SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Fisher Funds Income Fund and the SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio?
Both are international fi funds available to NZ retail investors. SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio charges 0.22% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 0.99%).
Which fund has lower fees, Fisher Funds Income Fund or SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio?
SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio has the lower annual fund charge (0.77% p.a. vs 0.99% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Fisher Funds Income Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 2.20% and SBS Wealth World Bond Portfolio's is 0.32% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.