ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · NZ Fixed Interest

Fisher Funds New Zealand Fixed Income Trust vs Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund

Both are NZ Fixed Interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Metric Fisher Funds Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.97% 0.49% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.38% 0.54% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$81m NZ$161m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds New Zealand Fixed Income Trust

The fund aims to provide stable returns over the long term by investing in New Zealand fixed interest assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds New Zealand Fixed Income Trust profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund

The underlying investment exposure is typically comprised of government fixed income securities, bank bills and cash equivalents, and securities issued by local authorities, semi-government organisations, and corporations, as well as to mortgage backed and asset backed securities. The underlying investment portfolio may from time to time be exposed to low grade or unrated debt securities to a limited extent, and derivatives. The fund also has the ability to invest in the Australian fixed income market either through Australian dollar denominated debt securities or
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments NZ Fixed Interest Fund profile →
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.