Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Listed Property

Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund vs Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund

Both are Listed Property funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is geographic and sectoral composition. The Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund holds a globally diversified mix of listed property and infrastructure names — American Tower Corporation (7.45%), NextEra Energy (7.31%), and Spanish airport operator Aena (5.69%) among its largest positions — giving it meaningful exposure to US infrastructure and utilities alongside property. The Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund is concentrated almost entirely in New Zealand-listed real estate investment trusts, with Precinct Properties (16.35%), Kiwi Property Group (14.12%), and Goodman Property Trust (13.91%) dominating its top holdings. Both funds sit at 98.31% growth assets, so the asset-class split is near-identical; the divergence lies in what those growth assets are and where they trade.

Risk indicators differ despite that structural similarity: Fisher Funds carries a risk indicator of 4, while Harbour sits at 5, suggesting Harbour's concentrated NZ-REIT exposure has produced higher historical volatility under the standard FMA calculation methodology.

The fee gap is significant. Fisher Funds discloses an annual fund charge of 1.53%; Harbour discloses 0.77% — a difference of 76 basis points annually. Over five years, Fisher Funds returned 5.08% per annum against Harbour's 0.04%, though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Fund sizes are comparable: Fisher Funds at NZD 162.8 million, Harbour at NZD 149.0 million.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund charges 0.76% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 1.53%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 15 listed property funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Fisher Funds

1.53%

Highest 17% of cohort

Harbour

0.77%

Lowest 23% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Fisher Funds

4.56%

Top 4% over 5 years

Harbour

1.51%

Bottom 21% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Fisher Funds

NZ$154m

Largest 10% in cohort

Harbour

NZ$130m

Largest 23% in cohort

Metric Fisher Funds Harbour Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.53% 0.77% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 4.56% 1.51% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$154m NZ$130m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

1

of each fund's top 10

Fisher Funds weight in shared

3.7%

of Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund top 10 is shared

Harbour weight in shared

15.5%

of Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Fisher Funds Harbour
GP Goodman Property Trust NZ
3.74% 15.48%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund

The fund focuses on growth of your investment over the long term by investing in New Zealand and international property and infrastructure assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund profile →

Harbour

Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund

The Fund aims to capture the income yield and medium-term capital growth characteristics of real estate assets by investing principally in listed real estate assets and enhance diversification and return potential against the S&P/NZX All Real Estate Index.
Full Harbour Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund and the Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund?
Both are listed property funds available to NZ retail investors. Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund charges 0.76% lower in annual fund charges (0.77% vs 1.53%).
Which fund has lower fees, Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund or Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund?
Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.77% p.a. vs 1.53% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Fisher Funds Property & Infrastructure Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 4.56% and Harbour Real Estate Investment Fund's is 1.51% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.