Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund vs Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their market exposure: the Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund tracks the Nasdaq-100 index via a single holding — the Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (100% weight) — concentrating entirely in large-cap US technology-oriented equities. The Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF, managed by Smartshares, channels 99.91% into the iShares MSCI EM IMI ESG Screened UCITS ETF, giving investors exposure to emerging-market equities filtered through an ESG screen. Despite both sitting at 98.31% growth assets, the underlying geographic and sector risk profiles are substantially different.

Fee structures diverge sharply. Foundation Series discloses an annual fund charge of 0.15%, compared with Smartshares' 0.59% — a 44-basis-point gap that compounds meaningfully over time. On risk, the Nasdaq-100 fund carries a higher risk indicator of 6 versus the Emerging Markets fund's 5, suggesting the historical return volatility of US tech-concentrated exposure has exceeded that of the ESG emerging-markets basket.

For performance context, the Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF discloses a five-year annualised return of 7.11%; the Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund's five-year return is not available in this snapshot, likely reflecting the fund's shorter operating history. Fund sizes are comparable — approximately NZD 25.9 million and NZD 23.7 million respectively.

Neither fund is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account product in the data provided. Readers should verify all figures — including fees, returns, and holdings weights — against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund charges 0.44% lower in annual fund charges (0.15% vs 0.59%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Foundation Series

0.15%

Lowest 9% of cohort

Smartshares

0.59%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Foundation Series

Smartshares

6.26%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Foundation Series

NZ$26m

Smallest 23% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$26m

Smallest 24% in cohort

Metric Foundation Series Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.15% 0.59% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 6 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 6.26% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$26m NZ$26m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Foundation Series

Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund

The Fund aims for high long-run returns by investing in an ETF that invests in shares of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange.
Full Foundation Series Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF

The Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the MSCI EM IMI Screened Index. The Index is comprised of emerging markets companies screened for exposure to controversial weapons, civilian firearms, tobacco, thermal coal and oil sands. The Index excludes companies that fail to comply with the United Nations Global Compact Principles. For more information, please refer to the Smart Responsible Investment Policy.
Full Smartshares Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund and the Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund charges 0.44% lower in annual fund charges (0.15% vs 0.59%).
Which fund has lower fees, Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund or Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF?
Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.15% p.a. vs 0.59% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Smart Emerging Markets ESG ETF applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Foundation Series Nasdaq-100 Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.