Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund vs Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment approach: Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund is an actively managed, income-oriented strategy, while Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund tracks an index passively. This distinction drives a significant fee gap — Harbour charges 1.10% per annum versus Mercer's 0.36% — a difference of 74 basis points that compounds meaningfully over time.

Despite sharing an identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, their risk indicators diverge: Harbour sits at 4 on the FMA's 1–7 scale, while Mercer registers at 5, suggesting the passive fund carries higher measured volatility, likely reflecting its fuller market-cap exposure. The five-year return figures reinforce a further contrast: Harbour returned 4.34% annually versus Mercer's 0.02%, though past returns do not predict future performance and the passive fund's near-zero figure may reflect a specific measurement window rather than structural underperformance.

Portfolio construction also differs. Harbour's top holdings are tilted toward infrastructure and logistics names — Infratil (8.88%), Contact Energy (8.32%), and Mainfreight (6.67%) — consistent with an income focus. Mercer's largest position is Fisher & Paykel Healthcare at 16.54%, reflecting index concentration in New Zealand's largest listed company by market capitalisation. Both funds are similarly sized, at approximately NZD 40 million each.

Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided. Always verify fee rates, returns, and holdings against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any figure here.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund charges 0.74% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 1.10%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

Mercer

0.36%

Lowest 20% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

2.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Mercer

0.02%

Bottom 4% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$35m

Lower half by size

Mercer

NZ$41m

Lower half by size

Metric Harbour Mercer Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.10% 0.36% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.81% 0.02% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$35m NZ$41m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

4

of each fund's top 10

Harbour weight in shared

30.5%

of Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund top 10 is shared

Mercer weight in shared

22.4%

of Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Harbour Mercer
Infratil Infratil NZ
9.64% 8.77%
Contact Energy Contact Energy NZ
9.84% 6.63%
Mainfreight Mainfreight NZ
6.58% 3.60%
EBOS Group EBOS Group NZ
4.48% 3.44%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund

The Fund is an actively managed strategy that invests predominantly in New Zealand and Australian listed equities that generate attractive dividend yields as well as cash and fixed interest securities.
Full Harbour Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund profile →

Mercer

Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund

The fund is a passively managed New Zealand shares portfolio that is designed to track the return of the S&P/NZX 50 Index. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the underlying investment managers' investment processes. The fund aims to provide a return that closely matches the return of the S&P/NZX 50 Index (on a gross basis and including imputation credits).
Full Mercer Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund and the Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund charges 0.74% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 1.10%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund or Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund?
Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.36% p.a. vs 1.10% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 2.81% and Mercer NZ Shares Passive Fund's is 0.02% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.