Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund vs Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.10% vs 1.06%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

Mercer

1.06%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

2.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Mercer

0.01%

Bottom 1% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$35m

Lower half by size

Mercer

NZ$32m

Lower half by size

Metric Harbour Mercer Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.10% 1.06% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.81% 0.01% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$35m NZ$32m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

5

of each fund's top 10

Harbour weight in shared

34.6%

of Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund top 10 is shared

Mercer weight in shared

29.8%

of Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Harbour Mercer
Infratil Infratil NZ
9.64% 10.52%
Contact Energy Contact Energy NZ
9.84% 7.11%
Mainfreight Mainfreight NZ
6.58% 5.01%
EBOS Group EBOS Group NZ
4.48% 4.15%
Spark New Zealand Spark New Zealand NZ
4.01% 3.05%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund

The Fund is an actively managed strategy that invests predominantly in New Zealand and Australian listed equities that generate attractive dividend yields as well as cash and fixed interest securities.
Full Harbour Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund profile →

Mercer

Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund

The fund is a diversified portfolio of predominantly New Zealand shares across a range of industries and sectors. The portfolio may also invest in Australian shares. The fund is managed to include specific additional responsible exclusions criteria which aims to avoid investments in certain companies or activities, and is managed with reference to environmental, social and governance factors. This fund has additional exclusions applied as described in our Sustainable Investment Policy and has been certified by the Responsible Investment Association of Australasia
Full Mercer Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund and the Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.10% vs 1.06%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund or Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund?
Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.06% p.a. vs 1.10% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 2.81% and Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund's is 0.01% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Mercer Responsible Trans-Tasman Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Harbour Australasian Equity Income Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.