Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Australasian Equity Fund vs Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material difference between these two funds is their five-year return history. The Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund returned 4.01% per annum over five years, while the Harbour Australasian Equity Fund returned 0.06% over the same period — a gap of nearly four percentage points annually. Both figures are after fees and before tax, as reported in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose, but past returns do not predict future performance.

On fees, the difference is minimal: Harbour charges 1.12% annually versus Salt's 1.10%, a spread of two basis points. Both funds carry a risk indicator of 5 out of 7, sit at 98.31% growth assets, and are of comparable size — Harbour at approximately NZD 117.4 million and Salt at approximately NZD 119.1 million. Portfolio construction is broadly similar, with Fisher & Paykel Healthcare the largest holding in each (15.7% and 15.24% respectively) and Infratil and Auckland International Airport both appearing in both top-five lists, though at different weights. Salt's top five also includes Contact Energy and EBOS Group, whereas Harbour's features Mainfreight and A2 Milk, reflecting modestly different stock selection within the same Australasian equities universe.

No PDS URL is currently available in our snapshot for the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund; readers should locate Salt's current Product Disclosure Statement directly on FMA Disclose.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz before relying on any information here.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.12% vs 1.10%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

1.12%

Upper half of cohort

Salt

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

0.83%

Lower half over 5 years

Salt

3.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$101m

Upper half by size

Salt

NZ$112m

Upper half by size

Metric Harbour Salt Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.12% 1.10% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.83% 3.81% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$101m NZ$112m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

6

of each fund's top 10

Harbour weight in shared

52.4%

of Harbour Australasian Equity Fund top 10 is shared

Salt weight in shared

48.4%

of Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Harbour Salt
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Fisher & Paykel Healthcare NZ
16.23% 16.10%
Infratil Infratil NZ
10.47% 8.06%
Auckland International Airport Auckland International Airport NZ
6.43% 9.12%
Contact Energy Contact Energy NZ
7.44% 6.10%
A2 Milk Company A2 Milk Company NZ
8.25% 4.87%
EBOS Group EBOS Group NZ
3.54% 4.19%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Australasian Equity Fund

The Fund is an actively managed strategy that invests predominantly in New Zealand and Australian listed equities. The Fund has a growth-oriented investment approach to generate alpha (return over the benchmark) for investors. The Fund incorporates an ESG strategy involving integration of Harbour s proprietary Corporate Behaviour Survey and external provider scores into investment decision making, company engagement, voting and zero tolerance exclusions. Further information on exclusions and processes is outlined in our ESG Policy.
Full Harbour Harbour Australasian Equity Fund profile →

Salt

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

The Fund targets a portfolio of shares of New Zealand companies that may, in our opinion, pay high and sustainable dividends. The investment objective is to outperform the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index on a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Australasian Equity Fund and the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.12% vs 1.10%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Australasian Equity Fund or Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund?
Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.10% p.a. vs 1.12% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Australasian Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.83% and Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund's is 3.81% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.