Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Australasian Equity FundvsSalt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Harbour Australasian Equity Fund

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their risk indicator rating: the Harbour Australasian Equity Fund carries a risk indicator of 5, while the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund sits at 4 — both on the standard 1–7 scale used by FMA Disclose. This one-point difference signals that Harbour's fund has historically exhibited greater return volatility, which is a meaningful consideration given both funds allocate an identical 98.31% to growth assets. The divergence likely reflects differences in portfolio construction and stock selection rather than asset allocation alone.

On fees, the two funds are nearly level: Harbour charges 1.12% per annum against Salt's 1.10%, a 2-basis-point gap that is unlikely to be a deciding factor. Fund size is comparable, with Salt at approximately NZD 112.5 million and Harbour at NZD 101.2 million.

The five-year return figures show a wider gap — Salt at 3.81% per annum versus Harbour at 0.83% — though past returns are not indicative of future performance and the differing risk profiles mean these numbers are not directly comparable on a like-for-like basis.

Both funds share Fisher & Paykel Healthcare as their largest holding (around 16%), and both hold Infratil, Contact Energy, and A2 Milk, though at differing weights. Harbours's portfolio shows a heavier tilt toward Mainfreight, which does not appear in Salt's disclosed top five. No PDS URL was available in our snapshot for the Salt fund.

Verify all figures against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.12% vs 1.10%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

1.12%

Upper half of cohort

Salt

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

0.83%

Lower half over 5 years

Salt

3.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$101m

Upper half by size

Salt

NZ$112m

Upper half by size

MetricHarbourSaltLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.12%1.10%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)54Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.0.83%3.81%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$101mNZ$112mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

6

of each fund's top 10

Harbour weight in shared

52.4%

of Harbour Australasian Equity Fund top 10 is shared

Salt weight in shared

48.4%

of Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund top 10 is shared

HoldingHarbourSalt
Fisher & Paykel HealthcareFisher & Paykel HealthcareNZ
16.23%16.10%
InfratilInfratilNZ
10.47%8.06%
Auckland International AirportAuckland International AirportNZ
6.43%9.12%
Contact EnergyContact EnergyNZ
7.44%6.10%
A2 Milk CompanyA2 Milk CompanyNZ
8.25%4.87%
EBOS GroupEBOS GroupNZ
3.54%4.19%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Australasian Equity Fund

The Fund is an actively managed strategy that invests predominantly in New Zealand and Australian listed equities. The Fund has a growth-oriented investment approach to generate alpha (return over the benchmark) for investors. The Fund incorporates an ESG strategy involving integration of Harbour s proprietary Corporate Behaviour Survey and external provider scores into investment decision making, company engagement, voting and zero tolerance exclusions. Further information on exclusions and processes is outlined in our ESG Policy.
Full Harbour Harbour Australasian Equity Fund profile →

Salt

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

The Fund targets a portfolio of shares of New Zealand companies that may, in our opinion, pay high and sustainable dividends. The investment objective is to outperform the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index on a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Australasian Equity Fund and the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.12% vs 1.10%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Australasian Equity Fund or Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund?
Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.10% p.a. vs 1.12% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Australasian Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.83% and Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund's is 3.81% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.