Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund vs Smart Australian Top 200 ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their geographic exposure. The Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund invests in New Zealand-listed companies screened against sustainability criteria, with its top five holdings — Infratil, Contact Energy, Meridian Energy, A2 Milk, and Fisher & Paykel Healthcare — concentrated in NZ equity markets. The Smart Australian Top 200 ETF, managed by Smartshares, tracks Australian large-cap equities, with its top holdings dominated by Australian banks and resources companies including Commonwealth Bank of Australia (10.37%) and BHP Group (9.45%). Despite sharing the same Australasian Equities category and an identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, these funds offer substantially different country and sector exposures.

Both carry a risk indicator of 5 out of 7. Annual fund charges are close but not identical: Harbour discloses 0.27% versus Smartshares' 0.30%. Fund size is also comparable — approximately NZD 380 million versus NZD 332 million respectively.

The five-year return figures diverge significantly in this snapshot: Harbour shows 0.15% per annum against Smartshares' 9.09% per annum, though past returns reflect different market cycles and do not indicate future performance. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account fund based on the data provided here.

The Harbour fund's sustainability screening methodology and the Smartshares fund's index-tracking approach represent further structural distinctions that investors may wish to examine closely. Always verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.27% vs 0.30%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

0.27%

Lowest 15% of cohort

Smartshares

0.30%

Lowest 16% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

0.15%

Bottom 10% over 5 years

Smartshares

9.09%

Top 11% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$380m

Largest 8% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$332m

Largest 9% in cohort

Metric Harbour Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.27% 0.30% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.15% 9.09% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$380m NZ$332m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund

This Fund is designed to track the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index, with exclusions to companies including but not limited to, large carbon emitters, gambling, firearms, and companies with human and animal rights violations. For full details of the exclusions for this Fund please see the Environmental, Social and Governance Policy (ESG Policy) on our website at Responsible Investing - Harbour Asset Management. There are positive and negative tilts applied to the remaining companies based on Harbour's proprietary Corporate Behaviour Score.
Full Harbour Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Top 200 ETF

The Smart Australian Top 200 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 Total Return Index. The Index is comprised of 200 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 200 ETF profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund and the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.27% vs 0.30%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund or Smart Australian Top 200 ETF?
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.27% p.a. vs 0.30% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.15% and Smart Australian Top 200 ETF's is 9.09% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Smart Australian Top 200 ETF does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.