Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Kernel Conservative Fund vs NZ Funds Income Generator

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two diversified funds is their asset allocation. Kernel Conservative Fund holds 23.37% in growth assets, positioning it firmly at the defensive end of the diversified spectrum, while NZ Funds Income Generator reports 98.31% in growth assets — a figure that sits at the opposite extreme and, combined with its risk indicator of 4 versus Kernel's 3, signals meaningfully different return and volatility profiles despite both carrying the "Diversified" category label.

The fee gap is equally striking. Kernel Conservative Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 0.25%, compared with 1.67% for NZ Funds Income Generator — a difference of 1.42 percentage points that compounds materially over time. On five-year returns, only NZ Funds Income Generator discloses a figure in this snapshot (0.9% per annum); Kernel Conservative Fund's five-year return is not available in the current data, likely reflecting the fund's shorter operating history.

Portfolio construction also diverges sharply. Kernel's top holdings are dominated by fixed-income instruments — an iShares US aggregate bond ETF at 12.89% and several New Zealand government securities — consistent with its defensive allocation. NZ Funds Income Generator's top holdings are Australian and global equities plus Goldman Sachs futures exposure, consistent with its near-total growth-asset weighting.

Fund sizes are broadly comparable: NZD 13.97 million (Kernel) versus NZD 15.82 million (NZ Funds Income Generator). Neither fund is large by institutional standards.

Verify all figures against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Kernel Conservative Fund charges 1.42% lower in annual fund charges (0.25% vs 1.67%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Kernel

0.25%

Lowest 6% of cohort

NZ Funds

1.67%

Highest 2% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Kernel

NZ Funds

0.90%

Bottom 6% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Kernel

NZ$14m

Smallest 25% in cohort

NZ Funds

NZ$16m

Lower half by size

Metric Kernel NZ Funds Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.25% 1.67% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.90% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$14m NZ$16m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 23% / 77% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Kernel

Kernel Conservative Fund

The Kernel Conservative Fund's investment objective is to provide a return (before tax, fees and expenses) that closely matches the return of the index of the reference portfolio. Investment strategy. Designed as a 30% growth / 70% income option by investing mainly in several of the other Kernel funds
Full Kernel Kernel Conservative Fund profile →

NZ Funds

NZ Funds Income Generator

The objective of the NZ Funds Income Generator is to provide a source of income by primarily investing in dividend paying shares and derivatives including options. The fund is anticipated to mainly own and trade New Zealand and Australian shares, derivatives including options over the minimum suggested timeframe.
Full NZ Funds NZ Funds Income Generator profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Kernel Conservative Fund and the NZ Funds Income Generator?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Kernel Conservative Fund charges 1.42% lower in annual fund charges (0.25% vs 1.67%).
Which fund has lower fees, Kernel Conservative Fund or NZ Funds Income Generator?
Kernel Conservative Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.25% p.a. vs 1.67% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.