ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Cash

Lifetime Cash Fund vs Summer New Zealand Cash

Both are Cash funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two cash funds is how each deploys investor capital. Summer New Zealand Cash holds a diversified portfolio of individual fixed-income instruments — government bonds, bank floating-rate notes, commercial paper from corporate issuers, and call accounts — spread across at least a dozen disclosed positions. The Lifetime Cash Fund, by contrast, allocates 98.47% of its assets to a single underlying vehicle, the Fisher Institutional New Zealand Cash Fund, with 1.53% held as cash at bank. Investors in Lifetime are therefore taking on a fund-of-fund structure with an additional layer of manager concentration risk absent from Summer's approach.

Risk indicators diverge despite both sitting in the cash category: Summer carries a risk indicator of 1, while Lifetime is rated 2. Growth asset exposure is minimal in both funds but slightly higher in Summer (0.31% versus 0.07%). Annual fund charges are close — Summer at 0.62% and Lifetime at 0.65% — though Lifetime's fee applies on top of whatever costs are embedded in the underlying Fisher fund, which the QFU data does not break out separately. Summer's five-year annualised return is disclosed at 2.41%; Lifetime's equivalent figure is not available in this snapshot, likely reflecting the fund's shorter operating history. Fund size also differs substantially: Summer holds approximately NZD 4.92 million in assets versus Lifetime's NZD 154,000, which may affect liquidity management and operational scale.

Always verify these details against the current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.65% vs 0.62%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Summer New Zealand Cash is roughly 31.9× the size of the other fund.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 5 cash funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Lifetime

0.65%

Highest 10% of cohort

Summer

0.62%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Lifetime

Summer

2.41%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Lifetime

NZ$154k

Smallest 10% in cohort

Summer

NZ$5m

Lower half by size

Metric Lifetime Summer Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.65% 0.62% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 2 1 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.41% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$154k NZ$5m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Lifetime

Lifetime Cash Fund

Invests in a range of cash and cash equivalent investments. Expected to experience low volatility.
Full Lifetime Lifetime Cash Fund profile →

Summer

Summer New Zealand Cash

The Summer New Zealand Cash fund invests in cash, cash equivalents and short-term New Zealand debt security assets. We aim to provide returns (before fees, taxes and other expenses) above the Official Cash Rate (OCR) over a rolling 12 month period.
Full Summer Summer New Zealand Cash profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Lifetime Cash Fund and the Summer New Zealand Cash?
Both are cash funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.65% vs 0.62%).
Which fund has lower fees, Lifetime Cash Fund or Summer New Zealand Cash?
Summer New Zealand Cash has the lower annual fund charge (0.62% p.a. vs 0.65% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.