Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Lighthouse Global Equity Fund vs Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their risk profile and portfolio construction. The Lighthouse Global Equity Fund carries a risk indicator of 7 (the highest band on the FMA's scale), while the Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund sits at 5 — a meaningful gap that reflects both how each fund is built and, in Mercer's case, the effect of currency hedging in dampening return volatility. Despite its lower risk indicator, Mercer allocates 98.31% to growth assets versus Lighthouse's 78.48%, with the remainder of the Lighthouse fund held largely in cash: BNZ cash at bank represents 22.04% of the portfolio at the snapshot date, suggesting the manager may be holding dry powder or managing redemption liquidity rather than being fully deployed.

Concentration is another point of contrast. Lighthouse's five named positions account for roughly 63% of the fund, led by Celestica (11.97%), Comfort Systems USA (10.57%), and Carvana (8.40%) — a high-conviction, mid-cap-tilted approach. Mercer's top five holdings sum to around 18%, reflecting a broadly diversified global index-aware structure with mega-cap technology names dominating.

On fees, Mercer charges 1.46% annually versus Lighthouse's 1.03%. Lighthouse has returned 10.71% per annum over five years against Mercer's 9.28%, though the cash drag, concentration, and higher risk indicator are relevant context for interpreting that difference. Both funds are similar in size at approximately NZD 17.7 million.

Always verify these figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on them for any investment decision.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Lighthouse Global Equity Fund charges 0.43% lower in annual fund charges (1.03% vs 1.46%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Lighthouse

1.03%

Upper half of cohort

Mercer

1.46%

Highest 10% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Lighthouse

10.71%

Upper half over 5 years

Mercer

9.28%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Lighthouse

NZ$18m

Smallest 15% in cohort

Mercer

NZ$18m

Smallest 14% in cohort

Metric Lighthouse Mercer Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.03% 1.46% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 7 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 10.71% 9.28% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$18m NZ$18m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 78% / 22% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged to NZD Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Lighthouse

Lighthouse Global Equity Fund

The fund invests in very large capitalisation stocks and Exchange Traded Funds listed on the NYSE and Nasdaq stock markets. It may use leverage of up to 30% of NAV. The fund's foreign currency exposures are not hedged back to New Zealand dollars.
Full Lighthouse Lighthouse Global Equity Fund profile →

Mercer

Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund

The fund invests in shares listed on share markets predominately in developed economies and is fully hedged to the New Zealand dollar. The portfolio uses multiple managers and is diversified by region, manager and investment approaches. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the underlying investment managers’ investment processes. The fund aims to provide a Gross Return above the return of the MSCI World Index with net dividends reinvested (100% hedged NZD on an after-tax basis) on a rolling three-year basis.
Full Mercer Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

L

Lighthouse

Not yet crawled. View fund page for FMA Disclose link.
Mercer logo

Mercer

Live

Last verified 2026-05-08

Common questions

What's the difference between the Lighthouse Global Equity Fund and the Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Lighthouse Global Equity Fund charges 0.43% lower in annual fund charges (1.03% vs 1.46%).
Which fund has lower fees, Lighthouse Global Equity Fund or Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund?
Lighthouse Global Equity Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.03% p.a. vs 1.46% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Lighthouse Global Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 10.71% and Mercer Core Hedged Global Shares Fund's is 9.28% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.