Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Mint Australasian Equity Fund vs Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Mint Australasian Equity Fund charges an annual fund fee of 1.19%, compared with 0.78% for the Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund — a 41-basis-point gap that compounds meaningfully over time on similar underlying exposure. Both funds sit at risk indicator 5 on the FMA's standardised 1–7 scale and hold an identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, so the structural risk profile is essentially the same.

Five-year returns are near-identical in the snapshot data: Mint at 0.24% per annum and Russell at 0.25% per annum, though investors should note these figures reflect a period that includes significant market volatility and may not be representative of future performance. Fund sizes are also closely matched — Mint at NZD 222.2 million and Russell at NZD 220.4 million — suggesting comparable scale.

Portfolio construction diverges modestly. Both funds hold Fisher & Paykel Healthcare as their largest position (Mint 14.85%, Russell 15.59%) and share Infratil and Auckland International Airport in their top five. The key difference is that Mint includes Meridian Energy (7.45%) and Contact Energy (6.59%) prominently, while Russell's top five replaces Meridian with A2 Milk Company (5.75%), indicating a somewhat different sectoral tilt within the same broad market.

Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided. Always verify fees, returns, and holdings against the current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any figures here.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund charges 0.40% lower in annual fund charges (0.78% vs 1.18%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mint

1.18%

Highest 23% of cohort

Russell Investments

0.78%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mint

0.30%

Bottom 17% over 5 years

Russell Investments

0.34%

Bottom 21% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mint

NZ$199m

Largest 16% in cohort

Russell Investments

NZ$209m

Largest 15% in cohort

Metric Mint Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.18% 0.78% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.30% 0.34% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$199m NZ$209m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

9

of each fund's top 10

Mint weight in shared

72.3%

of Mint Australasian Equity Fund top 10 is shared

Russell Investments weight in shared

67.9%

of Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Mint Russell Investments
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd NZ
17.65% 16.42%
Infratil Ltd Infratil Ltd NZ
12.63% 10.28%
Auckland International Airport Ltd Auckland International Airport Ltd NZ
8.54% 8.89%
Contact Energy Ltd Contact Energy Ltd NZ
6.04% 7.93%
Mainfreight Ltd Mainfreight Ltd NZ
5.21% 5.18%
Meridian Energy Limited Meridian Energy Limited NZ
7.58% 4.63%
Ebos Group Ltd Ebos Group Ltd NZ
6.50% 4.09%
Summerset Group Holdings Ltd Summerset Group Holdings Ltd NZ
4.57% 3.59%
A2 Milk Company Ltd A2 Milk Company Ltd NZ
3.56% 6.84%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Mint

Mint Australasian Equity Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in Australasian equities and targets medium to long-term growth. The Fund is benchmarked against the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index with an investment objective of outperforming the benchmark after fees and expenses over the medium to long term.
Full Mint Mint Australasian Equity Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund

The underlying investment exposure is typically comprised of a broad range of shares and other equity securities listed on the NZX. This may include derivative instruments which may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and to hedge any Australian dollar exposure. Investment in Australian shares will generally be in those companies which have a listing on the NZX.
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mint Australasian Equity Fund and the Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund charges 0.40% lower in annual fund charges (0.78% vs 1.18%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mint Australasian Equity Fund or Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund?
Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.78% p.a. vs 1.18% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Mint Australasian Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.30% and Russell Investments NZ Shares Fund's is 0.34% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.