Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation FundvsSmart NZ Top 10 ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 10 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 61.2% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

61.2%
Shared holdingSalt NZSmart NZMin weight
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare16.10%24.97%16.10%
Auckland International Airport9.12%15.36%9.12%
Infratil8.06%13.24%8.06%
Contact Energy6.10%10.01%6.10%
a2 Milk4.87%9.53%4.87%
Ebos4.19%5.19%4.19%
Meridian Energy4.06%8.13%4.06%
Fletcher Building3.30%3.59%3.30%
Mainfreight2.76%5.43%2.76%
Spark New Zealand2.66%4.45%2.66%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

Smart NZ Top 10 ETF

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment approach: the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund is actively managed, selecting and weighting holdings based on dividend growth criteria, while the Smart NZ Top 10 ETF is a passive index-tracking exchange-traded fund replicating the NZX's ten largest listed companies by market capitalisation. This distinction drives most other differences between them.

On fees, Salt charges an annual fund charge of 1.10% versus Smartshares' 0.60% — a 50-basis-point gap that compounds materially over time. Despite the higher fee, Salt's five-year return of 3.81% per annum compares noticeably with the Smart NZ Top 10 ETF's 0.29% over the same period, though past returns are not a reliable guide to future performance. Risk indicators diverge too: Salt sits at 4 (moderate) on the FMA's 1–7 scale, while the Smart NZ Top 10 ETF is rated 5 (moderate to high), suggesting the concentrated index approach has historically produced greater volatility.

Both funds hold near-identical growth asset allocations (98.31%) and share the same top five holdings — Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland International Airport, Infratil, Contact Energy, and a2 Milk — but the passive fund's weights are roughly double those of the active fund, reflecting its strict market-cap construction. Fund sizes are comparable at approximately NZ$112.5 million (Salt) and NZ$103.3 million (Smartshares). A PDS URL was not available in our snapshot for the Salt fund.

Always verify current fees, returns, and holdings against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart NZ Top 10 ETF charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.60% vs 1.10%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Salt

1.10%

Upper half of cohort

Smartshares

0.60%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Salt

3.81%

Upper half over 5 years

Smartshares

0.29%

Bottom 16% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Salt

NZ$112m

Upper half by size

Smartshares

NZ$103m

Upper half by size

MetricSaltSmartsharesLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.10%0.60%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)45Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.3.81%0.29%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$112mNZ$103mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Salt

Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund

The Fund targets a portfolio of shares of New Zealand companies that may, in our opinion, pay high and sustainable dividends. The investment objective is to outperform the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index on a rolling three year basis.
Full Salt Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart NZ Top 10 ETF

The Smart NZ Top 10 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/NZX 10 Index. The Index is comprised of ten of the largest companies listed on the NZX.
Full Smartshares Smart NZ Top 10 ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund and the Smart NZ Top 10 ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart NZ Top 10 ETF charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.60% vs 1.10%).
Which fund has lower fees, Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund or Smart NZ Top 10 ETF?
Smart NZ Top 10 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.60% p.a. vs 1.10% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Salt NZ Dividend Appreciation Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 3.81% and Smart NZ Top 10 ETF's is 0.29% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.