Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Smart Australian Top 200 ETF vs Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two Smartshares funds is market-cap exposure: the Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF targets mid-sized Australian companies, while the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF tracks the broad S&P/ASX 200 index, giving it heavy concentration in large-cap names. The Top 200's five largest disclosed holdings — Commonwealth Bank of Australia (10.37%), BHP Group Ltd (9.45%), Westpac Banking Corp (4.99%), National Australia Bank Ltd (4.70%), and iShares CORE S&P/ASX 200 ETF (4.50%) — reflect this large-cap and financials/resources tilt. The Mid Cap fund's top holdings are more evenly spread, with ALS Ltd (3.41%), Mineral Resources Ltd (3.04%), and Orica Ltd (3.02%) leading, suggesting less single-stock concentration risk.

Fee structure is a significant practical distinction: the Mid Cap ETF charges 0.75% annually versus 0.30% for the Top 200 ETF — a 45-basis-point gap that compounds over time. Both funds hold identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%, but their FMA risk indicators diverge: the Mid Cap ETF sits at 6 (higher risk), the Top 200 at 5 (moderate-to-high risk), consistent with mid-cap equities historically exhibiting greater volatility. Over the five years captured in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update, the Top 200 returned 9.09% annually versus 8.63% for the Mid Cap fund. Fund sizes are comparable — NZD $331.6 million and NZD $291.4 million respectively. Both funds share the same PDS.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Australian Top 200 ETF charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.30% vs 0.75%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Smartshares

0.30%

Lowest 16% of cohort

Smartshares

0.75%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Smartshares

9.09%

Top 11% over 5 years

Smartshares

8.63%

Top 13% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Smartshares

NZ$332m

Largest 9% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$291m

Largest 11% in cohort

Metric Smartshares Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.30% 0.75% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 9.09% 8.63% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$332m NZ$291m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Smartshares

Smart Australian Top 200 ETF

The Smart Australian Top 200 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 Total Return Index. The Index is comprised of 200 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 200 ETF profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF

The Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX MidCap 50 Index. The Index is comprised of companies listed on the ASX and included in the S&P/ASX 100 Index, but excludes companies included in the S&P/ASX 50 Index.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF and the Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Australian Top 200 ETF charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.30% vs 0.75%).
Which fund has lower fees, Smart Australian Top 200 ETF or Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF?
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.30% p.a. vs 0.75% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF's 5-year return p.a. is 9.09% and Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF's is 8.63% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.