Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Smart Australian Top 200 ETF vs Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two Smartshares funds is their fee level. The Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF charges an annual fund fee of 0.75%, which is 2.5 times the 0.30% charged by the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF — a gap that compounds meaningfully over time regardless of which market segment performs better.

Both funds sit under the same PDS, share the same manager (Smartshares), carry an identical risk indicator of 5 (on a 1–7 scale), and hold near-identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%. Fund sizes are comparable: $306.2 million (Mid Cap) versus $286.8 million (Top 200).

The funds diverge sharply in market exposure. The Mid Cap ETF targets smaller Australian companies — its top holdings include Pilbara Minerals, Light & Wonder, and Charter Hall, each below 4% weight, reflecting a more fragmented portfolio. The Top 200 ETF concentrates in large-cap names, with Commonwealth Bank at 9.71% and BHP at 8.35%, meaning single-stock and sector concentration is meaningfully higher.

On five-year annualised returns, the Mid Cap ETF returned 10.44% versus 9.93% for the Top 200 ETF — a modest 51 basis point difference over the period captured in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.

Neither fund is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account product; both are retail managed fund investments.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Australian Top 200 ETF charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.30% vs 0.75%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Smartshares

0.30%

Lowest 16% of cohort

Smartshares

0.75%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Smartshares

9.09%

Top 11% over 5 years

Smartshares

8.63%

Top 13% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Smartshares

NZ$332m

Largest 9% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$291m

Largest 11% in cohort

Metric Smartshares Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.30% 0.75% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 9.09% 8.63% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$332m NZ$291m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Smartshares

Smart Australian Top 200 ETF

The Smart Australian Top 200 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 200 Total Return Index. The Index is comprised of 200 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 200 ETF profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF

The Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX MidCap 50 Index. The Index is comprised of companies listed on the ASX and included in the S&P/ASX 100 Index, but excludes companies included in the S&P/ASX 50 Index.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Smart Australian Top 200 ETF and the Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Australian Top 200 ETF charges 0.45% lower in annual fund charges (0.30% vs 0.75%).
Which fund has lower fees, Smart Australian Top 200 ETF or Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF?
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.30% p.a. vs 0.75% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Smart Australian Top 200 ETF's 5-year return p.a. is 9.09% and Smart Australian Mid Cap ETF's is 8.63% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.