Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF vs Smart Australian Top 20 ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two Smartshares funds is their geographic exposure. The Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF tracks New Zealand's 50 largest listed companies, with its five largest holdings — Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland International Airport, Infratil, Contact Energy, and a2 Milk — all NZX-listed. The Smart Australian Top 20 ETF, by contrast, concentrates in Australia's 20 largest stocks, dominated by the major banks (Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, NAB, ANZ at a combined ~40%) alongside BHP. Both funds sit at a risk indicator of 5 and carry near-identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%, so the differentiation is country and sector composition, not asset-class structure.

Fee and return figures diverge meaningfully in the latest QFU snapshot. The NZX 50 fund charges 0.20% annually versus 0.60% for the Australian Top 20 — a threefold difference. Over the five-year period covered, the Australian Top 20 returned 10.37% per annum against just 0.33% for the NZX 50 fund, though past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns and the periods captured may differ across QFUs. Both funds are similarly sized: NZD ~206.7 million and ~194.8 million respectively.

Both funds are managed by Smartshares and share a common PDS. Neither is a KiwiSaver scheme; investors cannot direct KiwiSaver scheme account contributions to these funds through a KiwiSaver provider arrangement unless separately offered.

Verify all figures against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF charges 0.40% lower in annual fund charges (0.20% vs 0.60%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Smartshares

0.20%

Lowest 3% of cohort

Smartshares

0.60%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Smartshares

0.19%

Bottom 13% over 5 years

Smartshares

10.25%

Top 7% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Smartshares

NZ$198m

Largest 18% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$209m

Largest 13% in cohort

Metric Smartshares Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.20% 0.60% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.19% 10.25% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$198m NZ$209m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Smartshares

Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF

The Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/NZX 50 Gross with Imputation Index. The Index is comprised of 50 of the largest companies listed on the NZX. The weighting of each company in the Index is based on its market capitalisation.
Full Smartshares Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Top 20 ETF

The Smart Australian Top 20 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 20 Index. The Index is comprised of 20 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 20 ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF and the Smart Australian Top 20 ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF charges 0.40% lower in annual fund charges (0.20% vs 0.60%).
Which fund has lower fees, Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF or Smart Australian Top 20 ETF?
Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.20% p.a. vs 0.60% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Smart S&P/NZX 50 ETF's 5-year return p.a. is 0.19% and Smart Australian Top 20 ETF's is 10.25% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.