Fund-vs-fund · Diversified
ACI Growth Fund vs Booster Wealth Growth Fund
Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. ACI Growth Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 1.61%, compared with 0.91% for Booster Wealth Growth Fund — a gap of 0.70 percentage points that compounds meaningfully over time regardless of which vehicle an investor uses.
Both funds sit at risk indicator 4 on the standard 1–7 scale and share an identical growth assets allocation of 78.48%, placing them in the same broad risk-return band within the Diversified category. Fund sizes are comparable: ACI at approximately NZD 7.66 million and Booster at approximately NZD 7.23 million. Neither fund discloses a five-year return figure in the data available for this snapshot, so historical performance cannot be compared here.
Portfolio construction diverges notably. ACI Growth Fund concentrates its top exposures in managed funds-of-funds structures — chiefly Dimensional and Smartshares vehicles — with its largest single holding, Dimensional Emerging Markets Sustainability Trust AUD, representing 13.3% of the portfolio. Booster Wealth Growth Fund's disclosed top holdings are individual securities and cash, with no single position exceeding 3.63%, suggesting broader direct-security diversification, though the full portfolio breakdown may differ from these top-five figures. Apple Inc appears in both portfolios (ACI at 2.74%; Booster at 2.00%).
Both funds are retail managed funds, not KiwiSaver scheme accounts. Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Booster Wealth Growth Fund charges 0.70% lower in annual fund charges (0.91% vs 1.61%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
ACI
1.61%
Highest 4% of cohort
Booster
0.91%
Lower half of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
ACI
—
—
Booster
—
—
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
ACI
NZ$8m
Smallest 14% in cohort
Booster
NZ$7m
Smallest 13% in cohort
| Metric | ACI | Booster | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 1.61% | 0.91% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 4 | 4 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | — | — | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$8m | NZ$7m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 78% / 22% | 78% / 22% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
4
of each fund's top 10
ACI weight in shared
7.5%
of ACI Growth Fund top 10 is shared
Booster weight in shared
7.3%
of Booster Wealth Growth Fund top 10 is shared
| Holding | ACI | Booster |
|---|---|---|
 Nvidia Corp US | 2.72% | 2.34% |
 Apple Inc US | 2.74% | 2.00% |
 Amazon Com Inc US | 1.08% | 1.34% |
 Microsoft Corp US | 0.93% | 1.63% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
ACI
ACI Growth Fund
The Fund invests predominantly in growth assets such as New Zealand, Australian, international shares and property but includes some income assets. The allocations include a bias towards international diversification, and exposure to these asset classes is achieved by primarily investing in DFA Australia Limited (Dimensional) funds, utilising their Sustainability Trusts where available. Certain underlying Dimensional funds have an increased exposure to shares in small companies, value companies and companies with higher profitability with the objective of benefittFull ACI ACI Growth Fund profile →
Booster
Booster Wealth Growth Fund
The Wealth Growth Fund is suited to investors who seek potentially relatively high returns on average over longer term periods (seven years plus), allowing for short to medium term ups and downs, whilst excluding investments which do not satisfy certain responsible investment criteria. We aim to achieve this by investing primarily in growth assets, with a moderate allocation of income assets, and the application of our Approach to Responsible Investing policy.Full Booster Booster Wealth Growth Fund profile →
Common questions
What's the difference between the ACI Growth Fund and the Booster Wealth Growth Fund?
Which fund has lower fees, ACI Growth Fund or Booster Wealth Growth Fund?
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
