ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Amova Concentrated Equity Fund vs Pathfinder Ethical Trans-Tasman Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Metric Amova Pathfinder Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.15% 1.00% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.65% 1.73% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$13m NZ$13m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Concentrated Equity Fund

The fund aims to outperform the RBNZ Official Cash Rate plus 5.0% per annum over a rolling three-year period before fees, expenses and taxes. This fund aims to provide investors with concentrated exposure to New Zealand and Australian equity markets from an actively managed investment portfolio.
Full Amova Amova Concentrated Equity Fund profile →

Pathfinder

Pathfinder Ethical Trans-Tasman Fund

The Fund invests in Australasian equities, listed property companies and other assets that satisfy Pathfinder’s ethical investment criteria. This is a high-conviction fund of top investment ideas. The Fund may achieve this by investing in Pathfinders Wholesale Ethical Trans-Tasman Fund.
Full Pathfinder Pathfinder Ethical Trans-Tasman Fund profile →
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.