Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · NZ Fixed Interest

Amova Corporate Bond Fund vs Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund

Both are NZ Fixed Interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their portfolio composition. The Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund holds its five largest positions entirely in NZ Government Stock, which together account for roughly 36% of the portfolio, indicating a strong orientation toward sovereign credit. The Amova Corporate Bond Fund, by contrast, concentrates its top holdings in corporate and quasi-government issuers — including Housing NZ, NZ Local Government Funding Agency, Bank of New Zealand, Rabobank, and IAG — with no single position exceeding 3.1% of the fund, suggesting a more diversified spread across corporate bonds.

On fees, Harbour charges an annual fund charge of 0.66% versus Amova's 0.70%, a difference of four basis points. Both funds carry an identical risk indicator of 3 out of 7 and report the same growth asset allocation of 0.07%. Amova is the larger fund at approximately NZD $558 million, roughly double Harbour's NZD $289 million. Over the five-year period disclosed in each fund's Quarterly Fund Update, Amova returned 1.63% per annum against Harbour's 1.13%, though past returns are not a reliable indicator of future performance and the measurement periods may not align precisely between the two QFUs.

Both funds sit in the NZ Fixed Interest category. Neither is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account based on the data provided here.

Always verify all figures against the source Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update available on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary for any investment decision.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.70% vs 0.66%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 14 nz fixed interest funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

0.70%

Upper half of cohort

Harbour

0.66%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

1.63%

Top 19% over 5 years

Harbour

1.13%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$558m

Largest 25% in cohort

Harbour

NZ$289m

Upper half by size

Metric Amova Harbour Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.70% 0.66% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 1.63% 1.13% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$558m NZ$289m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Corporate Bond Fund

The Fund aims to outperform the Bloomberg NZBond Credit 0+ Year Index by 0.70% p.A. Over a rolling three year period before fees, expenses and taxes. The fund aims to provide investors with regular income by constructing an actively managed investment portfolio of New Zealand bonds, deposits and cash whilst preserving the capital value.
Full Amova Amova Corporate Bond Fund profile →

Harbour

Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund

The Fund is an actively managed investment grade bond fund that invests mainly in New Zealand government bond and corporate bond fixed income securities.
Full Harbour Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Corporate Bond Fund and the Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund?
Both are nz fixed interest funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.70% vs 0.66%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Corporate Bond Fund or Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund?
Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.66% p.a. vs 0.70% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Amova Corporate Bond Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 1.63% and Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund's is 1.13% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.