Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund vs Foundation Series US 500 Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund charges an annual fund fee of 1.20%, while the Foundation Series US 500 Fund charges 0.03% — a gap of 117 basis points that compounds significantly over time on similar-sized portfolios. Both funds held approximately NZD 242 million and NZD 241 million respectively at the snapshot date, and both allocate 98.31% to growth assets.

The funds also diverge sharply in construction. Amova's fund is an actively managed, currency-hedged portfolio of individual global equities, with its five largest disclosed positions being Nvidia (8.15%), Microsoft (5.73%), Amazon (5.72%), Broadcom (3.79%), and Netflix (3.63%). Foundation Series takes a single-instrument passive approach, with 99.69% held in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF and 0.31% in BNZ cash — giving it pure, unhedged US large-cap exposure rather than broader global coverage.

On risk, Amova carries a risk indicator of 6 versus Foundation Series at 5, suggesting higher expected volatility in the Amova fund under the standardised FMA scale. Amova discloses a five-year annualised return of 2.37%; Foundation Series's five-year return figure is not available in our current snapshot, so a like-for-like performance comparison cannot be made here.

Readers should verify all figures — including fees, returns, and fund composition — against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Foundation Series US 500 Fund charges 1.17% lower in annual fund charges (0.03% vs 1.20%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

1.20%

Highest 23% of cohort

Foundation Series

0.03%

Lowest 1% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

2.37%

Bottom 10% over 5 years

Foundation Series

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$243m

Largest 25% in cohort

Foundation Series

NZ$241m

Upper half by size

Metric Amova Foundation Series Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.20% 0.03% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 6 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 2.37% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$243m NZ$241m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged to NZD Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund

The fund aims to provide investors with a relatively concentrated actively managed investment portfolio of global equities to achieve long term capital growth. This fund invests in a selection of around 40-50 companies from around the world, covering a diverse range of regions and sectors. Currency exposure created as a consequence of global equity investment hedged to the NZD. This fund has a very high level of volatility.
Full Amova Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund profile →

Foundation Series

Foundation Series US 500 Fund

The fund aims for high long-run returns by investing in an Exchange-Traded Fund ('ETF') that invests in shares of the largest companies listed on stock markets in the United States.
Full Foundation Series Foundation Series US 500 Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund and the Foundation Series US 500 Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Foundation Series US 500 Fund charges 1.17% lower in annual fund charges (0.03% vs 1.20%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Global Shares Hedged Fund or Foundation Series US 500 Fund?
Foundation Series US 500 Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.03% p.a. vs 1.20% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.