ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Amova Global Shares Fund vs Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is how they achieve international equities exposure. The Amova Global Shares Fund holds individual company shares directly, with its five largest positions — Nvidia (7.71%), Microsoft (5.42%), Amazon (5.40%), Broadcom (3.58%), and Netflix (3.43%) — each named as discrete line items. The Clarity – Capital Group New Perspective Fund is a fund-of-funds wrapper: approximately 98% of assets sit across two share classes of the Capital Group New Perspective Fund (51.85% and 46.28% respectively), with 1.87% held as NZD cash. Investors in Clarity therefore hold an additional layer of management, and the underlying holdings of the Capital Group vehicle are not directly visible in this snapshot.

Both funds sit in the International Equities category, carry an identical risk indicator of 5 out of 7, and report virtually the same growth-asset allocation of 98.31%. Fund sizes are comparable — Amova at approximately NZD 161.9 million and Clarity at approximately NZD 154.5 million. Annual fund charges are nearly identical at 1.20% and 1.21% respectively, though Clarity's fee applies on top of whatever costs are embedded within the underlying Capital Group vehicle, which this data does not separately disclose. On the five-year return figure, Clarity reports 7.29% against Amova's 6.69%, a difference of 60 basis points; neither fund's data in this snapshot attributes that gap to any specific source.

Always verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.20% vs 1.21%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 82 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

1.20%

Highest 23% of cohort

Clarity

1.21%

Highest 21% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

6.69%

Lower half over 5 years

Clarity

7.29%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$162m

Upper half by size

Clarity

NZ$155m

Upper half by size

Metric Amova Clarity Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.20% 1.21% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 6.69% 7.29% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$162m NZ$155m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via InvestNow · Direct InvestNow · Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Global Shares Fund

The fund aims to provide investors with a relatively concentrated actively managed investment portfolio of global equities to achieve long term capital growth. This fund invests in a selection of around 40-50 companies from around the world, covering a diverse range of regions and sectors. This fund has a high level of volatility.
Full Amova Amova Global Shares Fund profile →

Clarity

Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund

The Fund aims to achieve long-term growth of capital by investing in shares of companies located around the world. The Fund is managed by Capital Group, and favours companies expected to benefit from structural trends in the global economy.
Full Clarity Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Global Shares Fund and the Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.20% vs 1.21%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Global Shares Fund or Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund?
Amova Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.20% p.a. vs 1.21% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Amova Global Shares Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 6.69% and Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund's is 7.29% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.