Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Amova Global Shares Fund vs Fisher Funds Global Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their asset allocation profile. The Amova Global Shares Fund holds 98.31% in growth assets, making it almost entirely equity-exposed, while the Fisher Funds Global Fund sits at 78.34% growth assets — a gap of nearly 20 percentage points that implies meaningfully different defensive buffers and return volatility profiles despite both funds carrying the same risk indicator of 5 out of 7.

Both are international equities funds of comparable size: Amova at approximately NZD 161.9 million and Fisher Funds at approximately NZD 166.6 million. Fees diverge noticeably — Amova charges 1.20% annually versus Fisher Funds' 1.64%, a 44 basis point difference that compounds over time. On the five-year return figure, Fisher Funds Global Fund shows 8.54% against Amova's 6.69%, though past returns are not indicative of future performance and the periods or methodologies underlying each figure should be confirmed in the source documents.

The holdings composition also differs in character. Amova's top five are entirely large-cap US technology equities, with Nvidia at 7.71% the single largest position. Fisher Funds' top holdings include two cash or current account positions (ANZ and JPMorgan, totalling roughly 7.56%) and an S&P 500 futures contract, suggesting a more actively managed, partially hedged, or liquidity-managed approach rather than pure stock selection.

Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided here. Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Amova Global Shares Fund charges 0.44% lower in annual fund charges (1.20% vs 1.64%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

1.20%

Highest 23% of cohort

Fisher Funds

1.64%

Highest 8% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

6.69%

Lower half over 5 years

Fisher Funds

5.51%

Bottom 24% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$162m

Upper half by size

Fisher Funds

NZ$152m

Upper half by size

Metric Amova Fisher Funds Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.20% 1.64% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 6.69% 5.51% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$162m NZ$152m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 78% / 22% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

4

of each fund's top 10

Amova weight in shared

21.3%

of Amova Global Shares Fund top 10 is shared

Fisher Funds weight in shared

8.6%

of Fisher Funds Global Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Amova Fisher Funds
Microsoft Corp Microsoft Corp US
5.42% 3.21%
Amazon Com Inc Amazon Com Inc US
5.40% 2.22%
Mastercard Inc - Class A Mastercard Inc - Class A US
2.72% 1.58%
Nvidia Corp Nvidia Corp US
7.71% 1.57%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Global Shares Fund

The fund aims to provide investors with a relatively concentrated actively managed investment portfolio of global equities to achieve long term capital growth. This fund invests in a selection of around 40-50 companies from around the world, covering a diverse range of regions and sectors. This fund has a high level of volatility.
Full Amova Amova Global Shares Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds Global Fund

The fund focuses on growth of your investment over the long term by investing in international companies
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds Global Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Global Shares Fund and the Fisher Funds Global Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Amova Global Shares Fund charges 0.44% lower in annual fund charges (1.20% vs 1.64%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Global Shares Fund or Fisher Funds Global Fund?
Amova Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.20% p.a. vs 1.64% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Amova Global Shares Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 6.69% and Fisher Funds Global Fund's is 5.51% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.