Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Amova Global Shares Fund vs Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost: Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 4.38%, compared with 1.20% for the Amova Global Shares Fund — a gap of more than three percentage points that compounds significantly over time regardless of returns.

Risk profile also diverges. Hyperion carries a risk indicator of 6 out of 7, while Amova sits at 5 out of 7, both on the FMA's standardised scale. Both funds hold an identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, so the higher risk indicator for Hyperion likely reflects greater return volatility rather than a structural difference in defensive positioning. That concentration is visible in the holdings: Hyperion's five largest positions — Tesla (12.48%), Alphabet (11.06%), Meta (10.19%), Amazon (9.83%), and Arm Holdings (7.52%) — are high-conviction, individually weighted bets. Amova's top holdings are more distributed, with Nvidia at 7.71% and no other position above 5.42%.

On performance, Amova discloses a five-year annualised return of 6.69%; Hyperion's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot. Fund size is broadly comparable: Hyperion at NZD 176.8 million, Amova at NZD 161.9 million.

Neither fund is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account based on the data provided.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Amova Global Shares Fund charges 3.18% lower in annual fund charges (1.20% vs 4.38%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Amova

1.20%

Highest 23% of cohort

Hyperion

4.38%

Highest 1% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Amova

6.69%

Lower half over 5 years

Hyperion

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Amova

NZ$162m

Upper half by size

Hyperion

NZ$177m

Upper half by size

Metric Amova Hyperion Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.20% 4.38% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 6.69% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$162m NZ$177m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

3

of each fund's top 10

Amova weight in shared

18.5%

of Amova Global Shares Fund top 10 is shared

Hyperion weight in shared

21.3%

of Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Amova Hyperion
Nvidia Corp Nvidia Corp US
7.71% 6.68%
Amazon Com Inc Amazon Com Inc US
5.40% 9.83%
Microsoft Corp Microsoft Corp US
5.42% 4.79%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Amova

Amova Global Shares Fund

The fund aims to provide investors with a relatively concentrated actively managed investment portfolio of global equities to achieve long term capital growth. This fund invests in a selection of around 40-50 companies from around the world, covering a diverse range of regions and sectors. This fund has a high level of volatility.
Full Amova Amova Global Shares Fund profile →

Hyperion

Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund

The Fund invests primarily in growth-oriented companies primarily listed on a recognised global exchange, at the time of initial investment, and will also have some exposure to cash.
Full Hyperion Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Amova Global Shares Fund and the Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Amova Global Shares Fund charges 3.18% lower in annual fund charges (1.20% vs 4.38%).
Which fund has lower fees, Amova Global Shares Fund or Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund?
Amova Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.20% p.a. vs 4.38% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.