Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

AMP Growth Managed FundvsMint Diversified Income Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 39 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 13.8% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

13.8%
Shared holdingAMP GrowthMint DiversifiedMin weight
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare2.83%2.72%2.72%
Infratil1.50%1.94%1.50%
Auckland International Airport1.79%1.32%1.32%
Meridian Energy0.96%1.17%0.96%
Contact Energy1.17%0.93%0.93%
Mainfreight0.65%0.80%0.65%
Amazon.com1.12%0.63%0.63%
Ebos0.59%1.00%0.59%
a2 Milk1.09%0.55%0.55%
Nvidia2.29%0.51%0.51%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

AMP Growth Managed Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Mint Diversified Income Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their asset allocation. The AMP Growth Managed Fund holds 78.48% in growth assets, placing it firmly toward the aggressive end of the diversified spectrum and carrying a risk indicator of 4. The Mint Diversified Income Fund, by contrast, holds just 23.37% in growth assets and carries a risk indicator of 3, positioning it as a predominantly income-oriented portfolio. This difference in growth-asset weighting is the primary driver of the contrasting risk profiles and will materially affect how each fund behaves across market cycles.

On fees, AMP charges an annual fund charge of 0.81%, compared with Mint's 1.01%. Both funds are of similar scale, at approximately NZD 44.2 million (AMP) and NZD 41.1 million (Mint). The five-year return for AMP Growth is not available in our current snapshot; Mint Diversified Income discloses a five-year annualised return of 1.35%, though this figure reflects the fund's income-biased mandate rather than a growth-oriented strategy.

Portfolio construction also differs notably. Mint's largest disclosed holding is its own Australasian Equity Fund at 0.15%, with the remainder weighted toward fixed income instruments including NZ Government Bonds and bank securities. AMP's top holdings are direct equities including Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, NVIDIA, and Apple, with a New Zealand Government inflation-linked bond also featuring.

Readers should verify all figures — including fees, returns, and holdings — against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • AMP Growth Managed Fund charges 0.20% lower in annual fund charges (0.81% vs 1.01%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

AMP

0.81%

Lower half of cohort

Mint

1.01%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

AMP

—

—

Mint

1.35%

Bottom 11% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

AMP

NZ$44m

Lower half by size

Mint

NZ$41m

Lower half by size

MetricAMPMintLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.81%1.01%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)43Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.—1.35%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$44mNZ$41mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split78% / 22%23% / 77%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

AMP

AMP Growth Managed Fund

The fund has a well-diversified portfolio that aims to provide growth, primarily through holding growth assets diversified with a lower allocation to lower-risk income assets. The fund aims to achieve medium to high returns, in exchange there will be larger movements up and down in the value of your investments.
Full AMP AMP Growth Managed Fund profile →

Mint

Mint Diversified Income Fund

The Fund has a broad mandate which permits investments into New Zealand and international equities (including listed property if held), but will also hold cash and fixed-interest securities. The objective of the Fund is to deliver a total return (through a combination of income and capital growth) in excess of the Consumers Price Index (CPI) by 3% per annum, before fees, over the medium to long term. The relevant market index for the Fund is a composite index derived from the underlying asset classes of the Fund that make up the Fund's Strategic Asset Allocation.
Full Mint Mint Diversified Income Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the AMP Growth Managed Fund and the Mint Diversified Income Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. AMP Growth Managed Fund charges 0.20% lower in annual fund charges (0.81% vs 1.01%).
Which fund has lower fees, AMP Growth Managed Fund or Mint Diversified Income Fund?
AMP Growth Managed Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.81% p.a. vs 1.01% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.