Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Aurellan Hedged Global Shares FundvsKernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund

Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund (fund size NZ$27.3 million, annual fund charge 1.12%) and Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund (fund size NZ$28.3 million, annual fund charge 0.25%) are both international equities managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was 15.10% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 72 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 28.6% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

28.6%
Shared holdingAurellan HedgedKernel S&PMin weight
Alphabet4.08%5.40%4.08%
Nvidia2.35%7.60%2.35%
Meta Platforms3.07%2.24%2.24%
Apple2.01%6.68%2.01%
Amazon.com1.99%3.65%1.99%
Microsoft1.77%4.93%1.77%
Tesla1.69%1.87%1.69%
Broadcom1.05%2.63%1.05%
Visa0.92%0.91%0.91%
Netflix1.45%0.73%0.73%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is currency treatment. The Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund holds its US equity exposure without currency hedging, meaning returns to New Zealand investors move directly with NZD/USD fluctuations. The Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund, by contrast, applies currency hedging, seeking to insulate returns from exchange-rate movements — a decision that carries its own costs and basis risk but removes a significant source of short-term volatility.

Fee levels diverge sharply: Kernel charges an annual fund charge of 0.25%, while Aurellan's is 1.12% — a 0.87 percentage-point gap that compounds materially over time on equivalent balances. Both funds sit in the International Equities category with near-identical growth asset allocations (98.37% and 98.31% respectively) and similar fund sizes (approximately NZD 28.3 million and NZD 27.3 million).

Risk indicators differ by one band: Kernel carries a risk indicator of 6 and Aurellan a 5, likely reflecting the additional currency volatility retained in the unhedged structure. Portfolio concentration also differs — Kernel's top holding, Nvidia, represents 7.6% of the fund versus 2.35% in Aurellan, suggesting Kernel tracks a market-cap-weighted index with higher mega-cap concentration, while Aurellan appears more evenly distributed. Five-year return data is absent for both funds in this snapshot, so no performance comparison is possible. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on available data, though readers should confirm this against each fund's PDS.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund charges 0.87% lower in annual fund charges (0.25% vs 1.12%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund hedges its foreign-currency exposure to NZD; Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund is unhedged. NZD weakness boosts unhedged returns and reduces hedged returns (the inverse on NZD strength).

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 84 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Aurellan

1.12%

Upper half of cohort

Kernel

0.25%

Lowest 15% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Aurellan

—

—

Kernel

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Aurellan

NZ$27m

Smallest 24% in cohort

Kernel

NZ$28m

Lower half by size

MetricAurellanKernelLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.12%0.25%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)56Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.——Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$27mNZ$28mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedgingHedged to NZDUnhedgedHedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Aurellan

Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund

The Fund aims to provide exposure to a diversified portfolio of global shares managed using a manager-of-managers approach. The Fund mitigates currency risk by hedging most major foreign currency exposures to New Zealand dollars.
Full Aurellan Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund profile →

Kernel

Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund

The Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund�s investment objective is to provide a return (before tax, fees and expenses) that closely matches the return on the S&P 500 (NZD) Index
Full Kernel Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund and the Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund charges 0.87% lower in annual fund charges (0.25% vs 1.12%).
Which fund has lower fees, Aurellan Hedged Global Shares Fund or Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund?
Kernel S&P 500 (Unhedged) Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.25% p.a. vs 1.12% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.