Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund vs Smart Asia Pacific ETF

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment construction. The Smart Asia Pacific ETF (Smartshares) holds a single underlying vehicle — the Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF at 99.92% of the portfolio — giving it concentrated geographic exposure to Asia-Pacific developed markets. The BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund, by contrast, holds a diversified basket of individual global equities screened through a sustainability framework, with its five largest positions (Broadcom 6.88%, NVIDIA 5.97%, Apple 4.25%, Mastercard 3.39%, Home Depot 3.33%) indicating meaningful technology and consumer weighting across multiple regions. Investors are therefore choosing between a single-region, single-ETF wrapper and a globally diversified, ESG-filtered equity portfolio — a difference in both geographic scope and portfolio architecture.

Both funds sit at risk indicator 5 and carry identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%. Fund sizes are comparable: Smart Asia Pacific ETF at NZD 110.9 million, BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders at NZD 117.8 million. The annual fund charge differs — 0.55% for Smart Asia Pacific ETF versus 0.77% for BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders. On performance, Smart Asia Pacific ETF discloses a five-year return of 8.66% per annum; BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot, likely reflecting the fund's shorter history on the New Zealand market.

Verify all figures against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Asia Pacific ETF charges 0.22% lower in annual fund charges (0.55% vs 0.77%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

BetaShares

0.77%

Upper half of cohort

Smartshares

0.55%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

BetaShares

Smartshares

8.66%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

BetaShares

NZ$118m

Upper half by size

Smartshares

NZ$111m

Upper half by size

Metric BetaShares Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.77% 0.55% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 8.66% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$118m NZ$111m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Unhedged Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

BetaShares

BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund

The fund aims to provide an investment return that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Future Global Sustainability Leaders Index, before taking into account fees and expenses.
Full BetaShares BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Asia Pacific ETF

The Smart Asia Pacific ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. The Index is comprised of large, mid and small cap companies located in Japan, Australia, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and New Zealand.
Full Smartshares Smart Asia Pacific ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund and the Smart Asia Pacific ETF?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Asia Pacific ETF charges 0.22% lower in annual fund charges (0.55% vs 0.77%).
Which fund has lower fees, BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund or Smart Asia Pacific ETF?
Smart Asia Pacific ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.55% p.a. vs 0.77% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — BetaShares Global Sustainability Leaders Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Smart Asia Pacific ETF does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.