ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund vs Milford Conservative Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

What's different at a glance

  • Milford Conservative Fund charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.85% vs 1.35%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Booster

1.35%

Highest 15% of cohort

Milford

0.85%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Booster

6.76%

Top 11% over 5 years

Milford

2.50%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Booster

NZ$873m

Largest 11% in cohort

Milford

NZ$939m

Largest 8% in cohort

Metric Booster Milford Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.35% 0.85% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 6.76% 2.50% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$873m NZ$939m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 23% / 77% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct InvestNow · Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

1

of each fund's top 10

Booster weight in shared

2.0%

of Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Milford weight in shared

3.0%

of Milford Conservative Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Booster Milford
NC NZ Cash (BNZ Bank Trust Account) NZ
2.02% 2.97%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Booster

Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund

The Socially Responsible High Growth Fund is suited to investors who seek potentially higher returns on average over long term periods (ten years plus), allowing for short to medium term ups and downs, whilst excluding investments which do not satisfy certain socially responsible investment criteria. We aim to achieve this by investing predominantly in growth assets, with little or no allocation to income assets, and the application of our Responsible Investment Policy.
Full Booster Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund profile →

Milford

Milford Conservative Fund

The Fund’s objective is to provide moderate returns and protect capital after the base fund fee but before tax over the minimum recommended investment timeframe of three years. It is a diversified fund that primarily invests in fixed interest securities, with a moderate allocation to equities.
Full Milford Milford Conservative Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund and the Milford Conservative Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Milford Conservative Fund charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.85% vs 1.35%).
Which fund has lower fees, Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund or Milford Conservative Fund?
Milford Conservative Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.85% p.a. vs 1.35% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 6.76% and Milford Conservative Fund's is 2.50% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Booster Socially Responsible High Growth Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Milford Conservative Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.