Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund vs Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 0.33%, while the Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund charges 0.93% — a gap of 0.60 percentage points that compounds meaningfully over time across both funds' similar sizes (NZD 383m and NZD 410m respectively).

Beyond fees, the funds diverge sharply in investment philosophy and portfolio construction. Russell's fund applies a sustainability screen and concentrates its top holdings in large-cap US technology names — NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon dominate — alongside an S&P 500 futures position, suggesting a broadly index-aware approach with ESG constraints. Brandywine's fund, managed under the Franklin Templeton umbrella, takes an explicitly opportunistic, value-oriented stance: its disclosed top holdings span Chinese internet (Baidu), European financials (BNP Paribas), aircraft leasing (AerCap), and consumer staples (Kimberly-Clark), with a 4.55% position in US Dollar cash. This reflects a more concentrated, contrarian, globally diversified mandate with no visible sustainability overlay.

Both funds carry a risk indicator of 5 out of 7 and hold 98.31% in growth assets, placing them in equivalent volatility bands. Five-year return data is unavailable for both funds in this snapshot, so historical performance cannot be compared here. Neither fund is linked to a KiwiSaver scheme account in the data provided.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund charges 0.60% lower in annual fund charges (0.33% vs 0.93%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Brandywine

0.93%

Upper half of cohort

Russell Investments

0.33%

Lowest 21% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Brandywine

Russell Investments

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Brandywine

NZ$410m

Largest 18% in cohort

Russell Investments

NZ$364m

Largest 19% in cohort

Metric Brandywine Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.93% 0.33% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$410m NZ$364m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Brandywine

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund

The Equity Fund will invest into an underlying fund that holds an actively managed portfolio of global equity and equity-related securities such as convertible securities (excluding contingent convertible securities), warrants, American depositary receipts (ADRs), global depositary receipts (GDRs), and preferred stock, including from emerging market issuers. Further details of the underlying fund are contained in the OMI and SIPO. The Equity Fund may, from time to time, use derivatives to hedge foreign currency risk.
Full Brandywine Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in a broad range of international shares listed on stock exchanges in developed and emerging international markets. The Fund targets a lower carbon exposure, and higher Climate Solutions Revenue, compared to the Benchmark. The Fund also employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, to implement investment strategies and to manage risk. Foreign currency exposures are unhedged.
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund and the Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund charges 0.60% lower in annual fund charges (0.33% vs 0.93%).
Which fund has lower fees, Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund or Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund?
Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.33% p.a. vs 0.93% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Russell Investments Sustainable Global Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.