Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity FundvsSmart US Large Growth ETF

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund (fund size NZ$410.3 million, annual fund charge 0.93%) is an international equities managed fund and Smart US Large Growth ETF (fund size NZ$499.7 million, annual fund charge 0.51%) is an international equities ETF, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was 13.85% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Smart US Large Growth ETF

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment approach. The Smartshares Smart US Large Growth ETF is effectively a single-holding wrapper: 99.88% of its portfolio is invested in the Vanguard Growth ETF, giving investors concentrated, passive exposure to large-cap US growth equities. The Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund, managed under the Franklin Templeton umbrella, holds a diversified basket of individual global equities — its top disclosed positions include Baidu, BNP Paribas, AerCap, and Kimberly-Clark, each weighted between roughly 2.7% and 3.4% — reflecting an active, geographically broader mandate.

This structural difference carries through to cost and risk. Smartshares charges 0.51% in annual fund charges against Brandywine's 0.93%, a 42-basis-point gap. Despite the higher growth-asset allocation similarity (both sit at 98.31%), Brandywine carries a risk indicator of 5 compared to Smartshares' 6, suggesting the latter's US-growth concentration is assessed as more volatile on the standardised FMA scale. Smartshares reports a five-year return of 13.81% per annum; Brandywine's five-year return figure is not available in our snapshot, so direct long-run performance comparison is not possible here. Fund sizes are broadly comparable: Smartshares at approximately NZD 499.7 million, Brandywine at approximately NZD 410.3 million.

Readers should verify all figures, including the latest fund charges and returns, against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart US Large Growth ETF charges 0.42% lower in annual fund charges (0.51% vs 0.93%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 84 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Brandywine

0.93%

Upper half of cohort

Smartshares

0.51%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Brandywine

—

—

Smartshares

13.81%

Top 8% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Brandywine

NZ$410m

Largest 18% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$500m

Largest 16% in cohort

MetricBrandywineSmartsharesLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.93%0.51%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)56Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.—13.81%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$410mNZ$500mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Brandywine

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund

The Equity Fund will invest into an underlying fund that holds an actively managed portfolio of global equity and equity-related securities such as convertible securities (excluding contingent convertible securities), warrants, American depositary receipts (ADRs), global depositary receipts (GDRs), and preferred stock, including from emerging market issuers. Further details of the underlying fund are contained in the OMI and SIPO. The Equity Fund may, from time to time, use derivatives to hedge foreign currency risk.
Full Brandywine Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart US Large Growth ETF

The Smart US Large Growth ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. The Index is comprised of large US growth companies.
Full Smartshares Smart US Large Growth ETF profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund and the Smart US Large Growth ETF?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart US Large Growth ETF charges 0.42% lower in annual fund charges (0.51% vs 0.93%).
Which fund has lower fees, Brandywine Global Opportunistic Equity Fund or Smart US Large Growth ETF?
Smart US Large Growth ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.51% p.a. vs 0.93% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.