Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund vs Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 4.38%, compared to 1.21% for the Clarity – Capital Group New Perspective Fund — a gap of more than three percentage points that compounds significantly over time regardless of performance outcomes.

Both funds sit in the International Equities category and carry an identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, meaning neither holds meaningful defensive assets. Their fund sizes are broadly comparable: Hyperion at approximately NZD 176.8 million and Clarity at approximately NZD 154.5 million. Where they diverge further is on risk: Hyperion carries a risk indicator of 6 (out of 7), while Clarity sits at 5, reflecting a measurably lower volatility profile on the standardised FMA scale. Clarity discloses a five-year return of 7.29% per annum; Hyperion's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot.

Portfolio construction differs sharply. Hyperion holds direct equities — Tesla (12.48%), Alphabet (11.06%), Meta (10.19%), Amazon (9.83%), and Arm Holdings (7.52%) — giving investors direct single-stock concentration. Clarity invests almost entirely through two share classes of the Capital Group New Perspective Fund (totalling ~98%), making it a fund-of-funds structure with an additional underlying fee layer that investors should examine in the underlying fund's documentation.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund charges 3.17% lower in annual fund charges (1.21% vs 4.38%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 81 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Clarity

1.21%

Highest 21% of cohort

Hyperion

4.38%

Highest 1% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Clarity

7.29%

Lower half over 5 years

Hyperion

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Clarity

NZ$155m

Upper half by size

Hyperion

NZ$177m

Upper half by size

Metric Clarity Hyperion Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.21% 4.38% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 6 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 7.29% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$155m NZ$177m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Clarity

Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund

The Fund aims to achieve long-term growth of capital by investing in shares of companies located around the world. The Fund is managed by Capital Group, and favours companies expected to benefit from structural trends in the global economy.
Full Clarity Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund profile →

Hyperion

Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund

The Fund invests primarily in growth-oriented companies primarily listed on a recognised global exchange, at the time of initial investment, and will also have some exposure to cash.
Full Hyperion Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund and the Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund charges 3.17% lower in annual fund charges (1.21% vs 4.38%).
Which fund has lower fees, Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund or Hyperion Global Growth Companies PIE Fund?
Clarity - Capital Group New Perspective Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.21% p.a. vs 4.38% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.