ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund vs Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund

Both are International Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their annual fund charge: the Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund discloses a 0.33% fee, while the Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund discloses 0.62% — a gap of 29 basis points that compounds meaningfully over time on similar-sized portfolios. Both funds sit in the International Equities category, share an identical risk indicator of 5 (on a scale of 1–7), report virtually identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%, and hold comparable fund sizes (approximately NZD 768 million and NZD 773 million respectively). Neither fund discloses a five-year return figure in this snapshot, so historical performance comparisons are not possible here.

Where the funds diverge most visibly beyond fees is portfolio construction. Russell's fund carries heavy concentration in large-cap US technology names — NVIDIA (4.62%), Apple (4.26%), Microsoft (3.30%) — and notably includes an S&P 500 futures position (3.16%), suggesting index-replication or hedging mechanics consistent with its "hedged" label. Evidential's fund, by contrast, shows a highly dispersed holding structure with no single position above 0.68%, reflecting a factor-based approach that tilts away from market-cap concentration. Russell's currency hedging is signalled by its fund name; Evidential's currency treatment is not explicitly indicated in this data snapshot.

Five-year return figures are absent for both funds in this snapshot, limiting long-run performance comparison. Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund charges 0.29% lower in annual fund charges (0.33% vs 0.62%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 82 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Evidential

0.62%

Upper half of cohort

Russell Investments

0.33%

Lowest 22% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Evidential

Russell Investments

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Evidential

NZ$773m

Largest 9% in cohort

Russell Investments

NZ$744m

Largest 10% in cohort

Metric Evidential Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.62% 0.33% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$773m NZ$744m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged to NZD Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes Yes Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct InvestNow Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Evidential

Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund

The fund invests in a diversified portfolio of small and medium capitalisation companies associated with global developed markets (excluding Australia and New Zealand), with an emphasis on companies that are expected to have higher returns. The fund also takes into account certain environmental and social considerations. The fund’s currency position is unhedged.
Full Evidential Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in a broad range of international shares listed on stock exchanges in developed and emerging international markets. The Fund targets a lower carbon exposure, and higher Climate Solutions Revenue, compared to the Benchmark. The Fund also employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, to implement investment strategies and to manage risk. Foreign currency exposures are largely hedged back to New Zealand dollars.
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund and the Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund charges 0.29% lower in annual fund charges (0.33% vs 0.62%).
Which fund has lower fees, Evidential Sustainable Targeted Factor Fund or Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund?
Russell Investments Hedged Sustainable Global Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.33% p.a. vs 0.62% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.