Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International FI

Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE FundvsFisher Funds BondPlus Fund

Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund (fund size NZ$88.5 million, annual fund charge 0.76%) and Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund (fund size NZ$94.9 million, annual fund charge 1.26%) are both international fixed interest managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was 1.28% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their risk indicator rating despite sharing the same asset allocation profile. The Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund carries a risk indicator of 3 (on the FMA's 1–7 scale), while the Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund sits at 4, suggesting Coolabah's portfolio has historically exhibited greater return volatility. Both funds report identical growth asset exposure of 0.07%, so the difference in risk grading likely reflects Coolabah's concentration in bank-issued medium-term notes — Westpac, NAB, and ANZ paper dominate its top holdings — compared to BondPlus's more geographically diversified sovereign and supranational exposure across UK gilts, US Treasuries, French government bonds, and China Development Bank debt.

The fee gap is also meaningful: BondPlus charges 1.26% per annum versus Coolabah's 0.76%, a 50-basis-point difference on funds of similar size (approximately NZD 94.9 million and NZD 88.5 million respectively). On the five-year return comparison, BondPlus records 0.53% per annum; Coolabah's five-year return is not disclosed in this snapshot, most likely because the fund lacks a full five-year history. Investors cannot make a like-for-like return comparison on that basis alone. Both funds are similar in overall size and neither is a KiwiSaver scheme account.

Always verify these figures against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary for any investment decision.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.76% vs 1.26%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 31 international fi funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Coolabah

0.76%

Upper half of cohort

Fisher Funds

1.26%

Highest 11% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Coolabah

—

—

Fisher Funds

0.53%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Coolabah

NZ$88m

Lower half by size

Fisher Funds

NZ$95m

Lower half by size

MetricCoolabahFisher FundsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.76%1.26%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)43Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.—0.53%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$88mNZ$95mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split0% / 100%0% / 100%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

1

of each fund's top 10

Coolabah weight in shared

6.6%

of Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund top 10 is shared

Fisher Funds weight in shared

0.9%

of Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund top 10 is shared

HoldingCoolabahFisher Funds
PCPIE CashNZ
6.56%0.95%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Coolabah

Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund

The fund offers an actively managed fixed-income strategy focused on mispricings in government and corporate bond markets with an interest rate duration risk broadly similar to that of the Index. The fund currently invests in an underlying fund managed by Coolabah Capital Investments (Retail) Pty Limited (Investment Manager) and targets a position of being fully hedged back to New Zealand dollars.
Full Coolabah Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund profile →

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund

The fund aims to provide stable returns over the long term by investing in international fixed interest assets
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund and the Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund?
Both are international fi funds available to NZ retail investors. Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund charges 0.50% lower in annual fund charges (0.76% vs 1.26%).
Which fund has lower fees, Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund or Fisher Funds BondPlus Fund?
Coolabah Active Composite Bond PIE Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.76% p.a. vs 1.26% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.