Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International FI

Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE FundvsDimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund

Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund (fund size NZ$223.8 million, annual fund charge 1.76%) and Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund (fund size NZ$213.2 million, annual fund charge 0.32%) are both international fixed interest managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; for the year to 31 March 2026 their 1-year returns after fees and tax were 3.75% and 1.50%, per their quarterly fund updates filed on FMA Disclose.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost: the Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund charges an annual fund fee of 0.32%, while the Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund charges 1.76% — a gap of 1.44 percentage points that compounds directly against net returns over time. Both funds sit in the International Fixed Income category, carry an identical risk indicator of 3 out of 7, and report an identical growth assets allocation of 0.07%, so the fee differential is not explained by a difference in stated risk profile or asset-class positioning.

Portfolio construction reveals a further strategic contrast. Dimensional's disclosed holdings are concentrated in named government and quasi-government bonds across Canada, the UK, France, and Belgium, with individual weights clustering around 1.0–1.25% — a pattern consistent with a broadly diversified, long-only bond mandate. Coolabah's top holdings include a currency forward (EUR/AUD), significant AUD cash positions, and instruments labelled with short-form identifiers, reflecting the long-short, derivatives-active approach signalled by the fund's name. The single largest Coolabah holding (10.1%) is roughly eight times the size of Dimensional's largest disclosed position, indicating materially higher concentration at the top of the book.

Fund size is broadly comparable: Dimensional at NZD 213.2 million, Coolabah at NZD 223.8 million. Neither fund discloses a five-year return figure in this snapshot, so historical performance cannot be compared here. Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account product based on the data provided.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary for any investment decision.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund charges 1.44% lower in annual fund charges (0.32% vs 1.76%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 31 international fi funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Coolabah

1.76%

Highest 5% of cohort

Dimensional

0.32%

Lowest 19% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Coolabah

—

—

Dimensional

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Coolabah

NZ$224m

Upper half by size

Dimensional

NZ$213m

Upper half by size

MetricCoolabahDimensionalLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.76%0.32%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)33Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.——Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$224mNZ$213mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split0% / 100%0% / 100%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging—Hedged to NZDHedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoYesSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Coolabah

Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund

The fund provides exposure to an actively managed, absolute return fixed income strategy focused on exploiting long and short mispricings in global credit markets. The fund currently invests in an underlying fund managed by Coolabah Capital Investments (Retail) Pty Limited (Investment Manager) and targets a position of being fully hedged back to New Zealand dollars.
Full Coolabah Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund profile →

Dimensional

Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund

Ordinarily the Fund gets exposure to a diverse portfolio of Investment Grade corporate and government global fixed interest securities, with a maximum maturity of twenty years from the date of settlement. Dimensional generally changes the portfolio's exposure to term risk and credit risk in response to changes in security prices, while keeping the portfolio's overall weighted average duration similar to the overall weighted average duration of the global bond market. The Fund intends to achieve this exposure by investing in funds and/or directly in fixed interest
Full Dimensional Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund and the Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund?
Both are international fi funds available to NZ retail investors. Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund charges 1.44% lower in annual fund charges (0.32% vs 1.76%).
Which fund has lower fees, Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund or Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund?
Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.32% p.a. vs 1.76% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Dimensional Global Bond Sustainability PIE Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Coolabah Long-Short Credit PIE Fund does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.