ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International FI

Daintree Core Income PIE vs Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund

Both are International FI funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is how they are constructed. The Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund holds a diversified portfolio of individual corporate bonds directly — its five largest positions range from 2.93% to 4.38% and include names such as Bank of America, T-Mobile USA, and Barclays — giving investors direct visibility into underlying credit exposures. The Daintree Core Income PIE, by contrast, allocates 99.17% of its assets to a single underlying vehicle, the Daintree Core Income Trust NZD, with the remainder in NZD cash at bank. Investors in the PIE are therefore exposed to whatever the underlying trust holds, and the holdings disclosed at the PIE level offer limited transparency without examining that trust separately.

On fees, Daintree charges an annual fund charge of 0.73% versus Milford's 0.85%, a difference of 12 basis points. Both funds carry a risk indicator of 3 out of 7. Fund sizes are comparable — Milford at approximately NZD 407 million and Daintree at approximately NZD 337 million. Growth asset allocations are low for both, at 0.13% (Milford) and 0.07% (Daintree), consistent with their income-oriented mandates.

On five-year returns, Milford discloses 1.26% per annum; Daintree's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot, likely reflecting the fund's shorter track record, so a direct historical performance comparison cannot be made here.

Always verify all details against the source PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Daintree Core Income PIE charges 0.12% lower in annual fund charges (0.73% vs 0.85%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 31 international fi funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Daintree

0.73%

Upper half of cohort

Milford

0.85%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Daintree

Milford

1.26%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Daintree

NZ$337m

Largest 24% in cohort

Milford

NZ$407m

Largest 18% in cohort

Metric Daintree Milford Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.73% 0.85% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 3 3 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 1.26% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$337m NZ$407m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 0% / 100% 0% / 100% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via InvestNow · Direct InvestNow · Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Daintree

Daintree Core Income PIE

The Fund invests into the Daintree Core Income Trust with a diversified portfolio of international credit and fixed income securities and cash and applies a range of strategies that include duration and yield curve management, (actively managing the maturity profile of the portfolio), sector rotation and individual security selection. The aim of the Fund is to provide an absolute return (greater than cash) over time and a steady stream of income and capital stability over the medium term.
Full Daintree Daintree Core Income PIE profile →

Milford

Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund

The Fund's objective is to protect capital and generate a positive NZD-hedged return after the base fund fee but before tax, that exceeds the relevant benchmark over the minimum recommended investment timeframe of three years. It primarily invests in global corporate fixed interest securities.
Full Milford Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Daintree Core Income PIE and the Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund?
Both are international fi funds available to NZ retail investors. Daintree Core Income PIE charges 0.12% lower in annual fund charges (0.73% vs 0.85%).
Which fund has lower fees, Daintree Core Income PIE or Milford Global Corporate Bond Fund?
Daintree Core Income PIE has the lower annual fund charge (0.73% p.a. vs 0.85% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.