Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund vs Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

What's different at a glance

  • Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund charges 0.25% lower in annual fund charges (1.17% vs 1.42%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Fisher Funds

1.42%

Highest 6% of cohort

Octagon

1.17%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Fisher Funds

1.47%

Lower half over 5 years

Octagon

1.25%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Fisher Funds

NZ$161m

Upper half by size

Octagon

NZ$161m

Largest 25% in cohort

Metric Fisher Funds Octagon Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.42% 1.17% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 4 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 1.47% 1.25% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$161m NZ$161m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

8

of each fund's top 10

Fisher Funds weight in shared

67.0%

of Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Octagon weight in shared

52.1%

of Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Fisher Funds Octagon
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp Ltd Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corp Ltd NZ
18.39% 14.68%
Auckland International Airport Limited Auckland International Airport Limited NZ
7.50% 7.72%
Infratil Limited Infratil Limited NZ
14.65% 7.03%
EBOS Group Limited EBOS Group Limited NZ
5.72% 4.97%
Mainfreight Limited Mainfreight Limited NZ
7.84% 4.00%
Meridian Energy Limited Meridian Energy Limited NZ
3.92% 4.32%
Contact Energy Limited Contact Energy Limited NZ
3.91% 5.59%
The A2 Milk Company Limited The A2 Milk Company Limited NZ
5.12% 3.82%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Fisher Funds

Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund

The fund focuses on growth of your investment over the long term by investing in quality New Zealand companies which can consistently produce increasing earnings
Full Fisher Funds Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund profile →

Octagon

Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund

The New Zealand Equities Fund invests mostly in New Zealand shares, and can invest in Australian listed shares, where the company has meaningful operations in New Zealand. It aims to achieve long-term returns (before fees, taxes and other expenses) greater than the S&P/NZX50 Gross with Imputation Index.
Full Octagon Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund and the Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund charges 0.25% lower in annual fund charges (1.17% vs 1.42%).
Which fund has lower fees, Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund or Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund?
Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.17% p.a. vs 1.42% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Fisher Funds New Zealand Growth Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 1.47% and Octagon New Zealand Equities Fund's is 1.25% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.