Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Foundation Series Balanced Fund vs Mint Diversified Growth Fund

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their growth asset allocation and the fee each charges to achieve it. The Mint Diversified Growth Fund holds 78.34% in growth assets against the Foundation Series Balanced Fund's 52.35%, placing them at meaningfully different points on the risk-return spectrum despite sharing a "Diversified" category label — a distinction reinforced by their respective risk indicators of 5 and 4. Investors comparing these funds are effectively comparing two different risk profiles, not just two managers.

On fees, the gap is substantial. Mint charges an annual fund charge of 1.20%, while Foundation Series charges 0.36% — a difference of 0.84 percentage points that compounds materially over time. Despite this fee differential, their disclosed five-year returns are close: Mint at 4.9% per annum and Foundation Series at 4.77% per annum, though past returns are not a reliable indicator of future performance and both figures reflect different market exposures.

The portfolios are structured differently. Mint's largest holding is its own Australasian Equity Fund at 13.79%, with direct equity names like Microsoft and Nvidia also appearing, suggesting a blend of in-house managed funds and direct securities. Foundation Series concentrates almost entirely in third-party ESG-labelled ETFs and funds, with its top five holdings accounting for nearly 100% of disclosed weight. Fund sizes are comparable — NZD 50.4 million versus NZD 45.5 million respectively.

Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Foundation Series Balanced Fund charges 0.85% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 1.21%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Foundation Series

0.36%

Lowest 14% of cohort

Mint

1.21%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Foundation Series

4.77%

Top 25% over 5 years

Mint

2.43%

Lower half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Foundation Series

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Mint

NZ$46m

Lower half by size

Metric Foundation Series Mint Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.36% 1.21% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 4 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 4.77% 2.43% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$46m NZ$46m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 53% / 47% 78% / 22% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

2

of each fund's top 10

Foundation Series weight in shared

2.3%

of Foundation Series Balanced Fund top 10 is shared

Mint weight in shared

7.4%

of Mint Diversified Growth Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Foundation Series Mint
Mercer Macquarie NZ Cash Fund Mercer Macquarie NZ Cash Fund NZ
1.71% 3.69%
$ Cash at Bank (BNZ) NZ
0.57% 3.69%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Foundation Series

Foundation Series Balanced Fund

Aims for mid-range long-run returns by investing in a diversified portfolio with a balance of income and growth assets. The Fund incorporates certain responsible investment considerations and is exposed to investment strategies that seek to limit exposure to companies involved in specific business practices.
Full Foundation Series Foundation Series Balanced Fund profile →

Mint

Mint Diversified Growth Fund

The Fund invests across a range of asset types which includes New Zealand and international equities (including listed property if held), but will also hold cash and fixed interest. The objective of the Fund is to deliver returns in excess of the Consumers Price Index (CPI) by 4.5% per annum, before fees, over the medium to long term. The relevant market index for the Fund is a composite index derived from the underlying asset classes of the Fund.
Full Mint Mint Diversified Growth Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Foundation Series Balanced Fund and the Mint Diversified Growth Fund?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Foundation Series Balanced Fund charges 0.85% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 1.21%).
Which fund has lower fees, Foundation Series Balanced Fund or Mint Diversified Growth Fund?
Foundation Series Balanced Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.36% p.a. vs 1.21% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Foundation Series Balanced Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 4.77% and Mint Diversified Growth Fund's is 2.43% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.