Fund-vs-fund · Diversified
Foundation Series Balanced Fund vs Mint Diversified Growth Fund
Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is their growth asset allocation and the fee each charges to achieve it. The Mint Diversified Growth Fund holds 78.34% in growth assets against the Foundation Series Balanced Fund's 52.35%, placing them at meaningfully different points on the risk-return spectrum despite sharing a "Diversified" category label — a distinction reinforced by their respective risk indicators of 5 and 4. Investors comparing these funds are effectively comparing two different risk profiles, not just two managers.
On fees, the gap is substantial. Mint charges an annual fund charge of 1.20%, while Foundation Series charges 0.36% — a difference of 0.84 percentage points that compounds materially over time. Despite this fee differential, their disclosed five-year returns are close: Mint at 4.9% per annum and Foundation Series at 4.77% per annum, though past returns are not a reliable indicator of future performance and both figures reflect different market exposures.
The portfolios are structured differently. Mint's largest holding is its own Australasian Equity Fund at 13.79%, with direct equity names like Microsoft and Nvidia also appearing, suggesting a blend of in-house managed funds and direct securities. Foundation Series concentrates almost entirely in third-party ESG-labelled ETFs and funds, with its top five holdings accounting for nearly 100% of disclosed weight. Fund sizes are comparable — NZD 50.4 million versus NZD 45.5 million respectively.
Verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.
Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.
What's different at a glance
- Foundation Series Balanced Fund charges 0.85% lower in annual fund charges (0.36% vs 1.21%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Foundation Series
0.36%
Lowest 14% of cohort
Mint
1.21%
Upper half of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Foundation Series
4.77%
Top 25% over 5 years
Mint
2.43%
Lower half over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Foundation Series
NZ$46m
Lower half by size
Mint
NZ$46m
Lower half by size
| Metric | Foundation Series | Mint | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 0.36% | 1.21% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 4 | 5 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 4.77% | 2.43% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$46m | NZ$46m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 53% / 47% | 78% / 22% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
2
of each fund's top 10
Foundation Series weight in shared
2.3%
of Foundation Series Balanced Fund top 10 is shared
Mint weight in shared
7.4%
of Mint Diversified Growth Fund top 10 is shared
| Holding | Foundation Series | Mint |
|---|---|---|
| | 1.71% | 3.69% |
| $ Cash at Bank (BNZ) NZ | 0.57% | 3.69% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
Foundation Series
Foundation Series Balanced Fund
Aims for mid-range long-run returns by investing in a diversified portfolio with a balance of income and growth assets. The Fund incorporates certain responsible investment considerations and is exposed to investment strategies that seek to limit exposure to companies involved in specific business practices.Full Foundation Series Foundation Series Balanced Fund profile →
Mint
Mint Diversified Growth Fund
The Fund invests across a range of asset types which includes New Zealand and international equities (including listed property if held), but will also hold cash and fixed interest. The objective of the Fund is to deliver returns in excess of the Consumers Price Index (CPI) by 4.5% per annum, before fees, over the medium to long term. The relevant market index for the Fund is a composite index derived from the underlying asset classes of the Fund.Full Mint Mint Diversified Growth Fund profile →
Documents
Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →
Foundation Series
LiveLast verified 2026-05-08
Mint
LiveLast verified 2026-05-08
- Quarterly Fund Update330 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- Supporting document648 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- Annual Report361 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- Statement of Investment Policy158 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- Product Disclosure Statement1853 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- Supporting document1425 kB · file fingerprint recorded
- + 2 more on the fund page