Fund-vs-fund · Diversified
Foundation Series Growth FundvsNZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy
Foundation Series Growth Fund (fund size NZ$62.4 million, annual fund charge 0.38%) and NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy (fund size NZ$58.2 million, annual fund charge 2.14%) are both diversified managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; for the year to 31 March 2026 their 1-year returns after fees and tax were 8.09% and 8.01%, per their quarterly fund updates filed on FMA Disclose.
Where you can buy these
Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.
Foundation Series Growth Fund
NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy
No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. Foundation Series Growth Fund discloses an annual fund charge of 0.38%, while NZ Funds Wealth Builder – Growth Strategy discloses 2.14% — a gap of 1.76 percentage points that compounds materially over time regardless of market conditions.
Despite carrying a higher fee, NZ Funds Wealth Builder – Growth Strategy reported a five-year annualised return of 0.96% against Foundation Series Growth Fund's 6.31% over the same period, though past performance does not predict future results. The risk profiles also diverge: Foundation Series sits at a risk indicator of 4 (out of 7), while NZ Funds sits at 6, reflecting its higher volatility profile. This is consistent with asset allocation — NZ Funds holds 98.31% in growth assets versus 78.48% for Foundation Series, yet the return outcome over five years runs in the opposite direction to what higher risk might typically imply.
Portfolio construction differs substantially. Foundation Series concentrates exposure through three ESG-labelled ETFs covering US equities, international equities, and global bonds. NZ Funds Wealth Builder's largest disclosed positions include Goldman Sachs Futures (13.41%) and Goldman Sachs OTC Derivatives (6.01%), indicating a derivatives-heavy, actively managed approach. Fund sizes are broadly comparable at NZ$62.4 million and NZ$58.2 million respectively.
Both funds sit in the Diversified category but represent meaningfully different strategies, cost structures, and risk levels. Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this data.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Foundation Series Growth Fund charges 1.76% lower in annual fund charges (0.38% vs 2.14%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Foundation Series
0.38%
Lowest 15% of cohort
NZ Funds
2.14%
Highest 1% of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Foundation Series
6.31%
Top 12% over 5 years
NZ Funds
0.96%
Bottom 6% over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Foundation Series
NZ$62m
Upper half by size
NZ Funds
NZ$58m
Upper half by size
| Metric | Foundation Series | NZ Funds | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 0.38% | 2.14% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 4 | 6 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 6.31% | 0.96% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$62m | NZ$58m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 78% / 22% | 98% / 2% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
2
of each fund's top 10
Foundation Series weight in shared
2.2%
of Foundation Series Growth Fund top 10 is shared
NZ Funds weight in shared
9.4%
of NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy top 10 is shared
| Holding | Foundation Series | NZ Funds |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62% | 4.69% | |
$Cash at Bank (BNZ)NZ | 0.60% | 4.69% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
Foundation Series
Foundation Series Growth Fund
Aims for high long-run returns by investing in a diversified portfolio weighted towards growth assets but with some income asset exposure. The Fund incorporates certain responsible investment considerations and is exposed to investment strategies that seek to limit exposure to companies involved in specific business practices.Full Foundation Series Foundation Series Growth Fund profile →
NZ Funds
NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy
The objective of the NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy is to grow your investment over the long term by investing in growth assets and other authorised assets with active management. The fund is anticipated to mainly own and trade New Zealand, Australian and international shares and/or hedge funds over the minimum suggested timeframe.Full NZ Funds NZ Funds Wealth Builder - Growth Strategy profile →
Documents
Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →