Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund vs Smart NZ Top 50 ETF
Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment approach. The Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund is an actively managed, sustainability-screened portfolio, while the Smart NZ Top 50 ETF is a passive index fund tracking the S&P/NZX 50 Index. This distinction drives several measurable divergences.
On fees, Harbour charges 0.27% per annum against Smartshares' 0.50%, meaning the actively managed fund is notably cheaper — an unusual reversal of the typical active-versus-passive fee relationship. Over the five-year period disclosed in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update, however, the Smart NZ Top 50 ETF returned 0.34% annualised compared to Harbour's 0.15%, a gap that investors will weigh against the fee difference and the sustainability mandate. Both funds carry a risk indicator of 5 out of 7 and hold 98.31% in growth assets, placing them at identical risk-profile positions under FMA's standardised framework.
Fund size differs: Smartshares holds approximately NZD $572.8 million versus Harbour's NZD $380.2 million. Top holdings overlap significantly — Infratil, A2 Milk, Meridian, and Contact Energy appear in both — but Harbour's active approach produces different weightings and excludes some index constituents while the Smartshares fund includes EBOS Group in its top five where Harbour holds Fisher & Paykel Healthcare instead.
Neither fund is structured as a KiwiSaver scheme account product in the data provided here. Verify all figures, including any updates since this snapshot, against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.
Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.
What's different at a glance
- Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund charges 0.23% lower in annual fund charges (0.27% vs 0.50%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
- Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Harbour
0.27%
Lowest 15% of cohort
Smartshares
0.50%
Lowest 22% of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Harbour
0.15%
Bottom 10% over 5 years
Smartshares
0.34%
Bottom 21% over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Harbour
NZ$380m
Largest 8% in cohort
Smartshares
NZ$573m
Largest 6% in cohort
| Metric | Harbour | Smartshares | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 0.27% | 0.50% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 5 | 5 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 0.15% | 0.34% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$380m | NZ$573m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 98% / 2% | 98% / 2% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | Yes | No | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
8
of each fund's top 10
Harbour weight in shared
45.8%
of Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund top 10 is shared
Smartshares weight in shared
40.6%
of Smart NZ Top 50 ETF top 10 is shared
| Holding | Harbour | Smartshares |
|---|---|---|
| | 6.21% | 5.52% |
| | 6.01% | 5.16% |
| | 6.09% | 5.15% |
| | 5.21% | 5.07% |
| | 5.69% | 5.00% |
| | 5.81% | 4.99% |
| | 5.22% | 4.87% |
| | 5.57% | 4.84% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
Harbour
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund
This Fund is designed to track the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index, with exclusions to companies including but not limited to, large carbon emitters, gambling, firearms, and companies with human and animal rights violations. For full details of the exclusions for this Fund please see the Environmental, Social and Governance Policy (ESG Policy) on our website at Responsible Investing - Harbour Asset Management. There are positive and negative tilts applied to the remaining companies based on Harbour's proprietary Corporate Behaviour Score.Full Harbour Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund profile →
Smartshares
Smart NZ Top 50 ETF
The Smart NZ Top 50 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index. The Index is comprised of 50 of the largest companies listed on the NZX, with a 5% cap on the weight of each company within the Index.Full Smartshares Smart NZ Top 50 ETF profile →
Documents
Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →
Harbour
LiveLast verified 2026-05-08
Smartshares