Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund vs Smart NZ Top 50 ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment approach and associated cost. The Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund is an actively managed, sustainability-screened portfolio, while the Smart NZ Top 50 ETF is a passive index-tracking exchange-traded fund replicating the S&P/NZX 50 Index. This distinction drives their fee gap: Harbour charges 0.27% per annum against Smartshares' 0.50%, meaning the active fund is notably cheaper — unusual in active-versus-passive comparisons and worth scrutinising against each fund's disclosed methodology.

Both funds sit at risk indicator 5 on the standard 1–7 scale and carry near-identical growth asset allocations of 98.31%. Fund sizes differ: Harbour holds approximately NZD 400 million versus Smartshares' NZD 627 million. The Smartshares fund discloses a five-year annualised return of 0.53%; Harbour's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot, so direct historical performance comparison cannot be made here.

Top holdings overlap significantly — A2 Milk, Auckland International Airport, Mainfreight, and Meridian Energy appear in both — but weightings diverge modestly, reflecting Harbour's active stock selection and ESG screening criteria versus Smartshares' rules-based index construction. Contact Energy features in Harbour's top five but not Smartshares', while Fisher & Paykel Healthcare appears in Smartshares' top five but not Harbour's, illustrating where active tilts and index composition part ways.

Neither fund is a KiwiSaver scheme account vehicle in this structure. Always verify fees, returns, and holdings against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on any figures here.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund charges 0.23% lower in annual fund charges (0.27% vs 0.50%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Harbour

0.27%

Lowest 15% of cohort

Smartshares

0.50%

Lowest 22% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Harbour

0.15%

Bottom 10% over 5 years

Smartshares

0.34%

Bottom 21% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Harbour

NZ$380m

Largest 8% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$573m

Largest 6% in cohort

Metric Harbour Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 0.27% 0.50% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.15% 0.34% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$380m NZ$573m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening Yes No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

8

of each fund's top 10

Harbour weight in shared

45.8%

of Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund top 10 is shared

Smartshares weight in shared

40.6%

of Smart NZ Top 50 ETF top 10 is shared

Holding Harbour Smartshares
Infratil Infratil NZ
6.21% 5.52%
Meridian Energy Meridian Energy NZ
6.01% 5.16%
Contact Energy Contact Energy NZ
6.09% 5.15%
EBOS Group EBOS Group NZ
5.21% 5.07%
Mercury NZ Mercury NZ NZ
5.69% 5.00%
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Fisher & Paykel Healthcare NZ
5.81% 4.99%
Mainfreight Mainfreight NZ
5.22% 4.87%
Auckland International Airport Auckland International Airport NZ
5.57% 4.84%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Harbour

Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund

This Fund is designed to track the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index, with exclusions to companies including but not limited to, large carbon emitters, gambling, firearms, and companies with human and animal rights violations. For full details of the exclusions for this Fund please see the Environmental, Social and Governance Policy (ESG Policy) on our website at Responsible Investing - Harbour Asset Management. There are positive and negative tilts applied to the remaining companies based on Harbour's proprietary Corporate Behaviour Score.
Full Harbour Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart NZ Top 50 ETF

The Smart NZ Top 50 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/NZX 50 Portfolio Index. The Index is comprised of 50 of the largest companies listed on the NZX, with a 5% cap on the weight of each company within the Index.
Full Smartshares Smart NZ Top 50 ETF profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund and the Smart NZ Top 50 ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund charges 0.23% lower in annual fund charges (0.27% vs 0.50%).
Which fund has lower fees, Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund or Smart NZ Top 50 ETF?
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.27% p.a. vs 0.50% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.15% and Smart NZ Top 50 ETF's is 0.34% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Yes — Harbour Sustainable NZ Shares Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. Smart NZ Top 50 ETF does not. Specific exclusions and engagement policies are documented in each fund's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives (SIPO).
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.