Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · International Equities

Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats FundvsKernel World ex-US Fund

Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund (fund size NZ$5.3 million, annual fund charge 0.25%) and Kernel World ex-US Fund (fund size NZ$9.3 million, annual fund charge 0.25%) are both international equities managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was 13.80% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 29 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 4.5% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

4.5%
Shared holdingKernel S&PKernel WorldMin weight
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.80%0.48%0.48%
CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LTD1.48%0.46%0.46%
Sanofi1.07%0.46%0.46%
Dividends Receivable0.42%0.52%0.42%
ENEL0.91%0.38%0.38%
bank of nova scotia halifax0.70%0.38%0.38%
NEW ZEALAND DOLLAR0.38%0.63%0.38%
Tc Energy Corp1.13%0.29%0.29%
SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC0.74%0.16%0.16%
Pembina Pipeline1.35%0.12%0.12%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment universe and underlying strategy. The Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund tracks dividend-focused companies with long records of sustained payouts — its top holdings include Verizon Communications (2.29%), Getty Realty (2.01%), and Pfizer (1.98%), reflecting a tilt toward telecommunications, real estate, and healthcare sectors with US exposure. The Kernel World ex-US Fund, by contrast, explicitly excludes US-listed equities, concentrating on developed and emerging markets outside the United States; its top holdings — ASML Holdings (2.25%), AstraZeneca (1.35%), and Novartis (1.29%) — skew toward European technology and pharmaceuticals. These different geographic and factor exposures mean the two funds behave differently in response to the same market events, despite sitting in the same International Equities category.

Where the data converges: both funds are managed by Kernel, carry an identical annual fund charge of 0.25%, share a risk indicator of 5 (on the standard 1–7 scale), and report an identical growth-assets allocation of 98.37%. Neither fund discloses a five-year return figure in this snapshot, so long-run performance cannot be compared here. Fund size differs — the World ex-US Fund reports NZD 9.25 million versus NZD 5.27 million for the Dividend Aristocrats Fund — though both are relatively small funds. Both funds share the same PDS dated August 2025, consistent with Kernel operating them under a single KiwiSaver scheme structure.

Verify all figures against each fund's current PDS and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on this comparison.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.25% vs 0.25%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 84 international equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Kernel

0.25%

Lowest 15% of cohort

Kernel

0.25%

Lowest 15% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Kernel

—

—

Kernel

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Kernel

NZ$5m

Smallest 3% in cohort

Kernel

NZ$9m

Smallest 5% in cohort

MetricKernelKernelLower / higher is
Annual fund charge0.25%0.25%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)55Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.——Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$5mNZ$9mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%98% / 2%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging—UnhedgedHedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Kernel

Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund

The Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund invests in globally listed multi-national, blue chip companies and is designed to track the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Quality Income DM ex KR Index (NZD)
Full Kernel Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund profile →

Kernel

Kernel World ex-US Fund

The Kernel World ex-US Fund's investment objective is to provide a return (before tax, fees and expenses) that closely matches the return on the S&P World Ex-U.S., Controversial Weapons and Tobacco (NZD) Index.
Full Kernel Kernel World ex-US Fund profile →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund and the Kernel World ex-US Fund?
Both are international equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (0.25% vs 0.25%).
Which fund has lower fees, Kernel S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Fund or Kernel World ex-US Fund?
Kernel World ex-US Fund has the lower annual fund charge (0.25% p.a. vs 0.25% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.