Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Other

Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund vs Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund

Both are Other funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is cost. The Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund charges an annual fund fee of 1.34%, compared with 1.08% for the Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund — a 26 basis point gap that compounds meaningfully over time on a buy-and-hold position.

Both funds sit at risk indicator 5 on the standard 1–7 scale and carry an almost identical growth asset allocation of 98.31%, so their risk profiles and asset-class positioning are structurally aligned. The Russell fund is roughly twice the size at NZD 153.4 million versus Mercer's NZD 83.8 million, though fund size alone does not determine investor outcomes.

On performance, Mercer discloses a five-year annualised return of 8.36%; Russell's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot, so a direct long-run comparison cannot be made. Investors relying on return history should check the latest Quarterly Fund Update for the Russell fund on FMA Disclose directly.

Both portfolios share meaningful exposure to NextEra Energy and Sempra, suggesting overlapping infrastructure themes. However, Russell's top holdings include a 7.38% cash-at-bank (BNZ) position, which is not evident in Mercer's disclosed top five — a difference that could reflect timing of deployment or a deliberate liquidity buffer. Mercer's top holdings are concentrated in US utilities and pipeline names; Russell's visible holdings show broader geographic reach including Transurban (Australia) and Aena (Spain).

Always verify current fees, returns, and holdings against each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (1.08% vs 1.34%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
  • Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund is roughly 2.0× the size of the other fund.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 8 other funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mercer

1.34%

Upper half of cohort

Russell Investments

1.08%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mercer

8.36%

Top 25% over 5 years

Russell Investments

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mercer

NZ$84m

Lower half by size

Russell Investments

NZ$168m

Upper half by size

Metric Mercer Russell Investments Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.34% 1.08% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 8.36% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$84m NZ$168m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

2

of each fund's top 10

Mercer weight in shared

9.1%

of Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund top 10 is shared

Russell Investments weight in shared

7.8%

of Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund top 10 is shared

Holding Mercer Russell Investments
NE Nextera Energy Inc US
5.21% 5.12%
NG National Grid PLC GB
3.93% 2.64%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Mercer

Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund

The fund invests in infrastructure securities in both developed and emerging markets across a range of sectors. This provides access to a range of infrastructure sectors across geographic regions, with active portfolio management that seeks to target excess returns and predictable, stable cash flows. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the investment process. The fund aims to provide total returns (income and capital growth) after costs and before tax, above the FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index (100% hedged to the
Full Mercer Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund profile →

Russell Investments

Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in infrastructure and infrastructure related securities that are listed, or expected to be listed, within the next six months, on stock exchanges in developed and emerging markets. The Fund employs certain investment exclusions, please refer to the SIPO for further details. The Fund also seeks to invest in corporations which follow good governance practices. Foreign currency exposures are largely hedged back to New Zealand dollars. Derivatives may be used to obtain or reduce exposure to securities and markets, implement investment st
Full Russell Investments Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Mercer logo

Mercer

Live

Last verified 2026-05-08

Russell Investments logo

Russell Investments

Not yet crawled. View fund page for FMA Disclose link.

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund and the Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund?
Both are other funds available to NZ retail investors. Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund charges 0.26% lower in annual fund charges (1.08% vs 1.34%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mercer Global Listed Infrastructure Fund or Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund?
Russell Investments Global Listed Infrastructure Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.08% p.a. vs 1.34% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.