Fund-vs-fund · Diversified
Mercer Income Generator Fund vs Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund
Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.
Why these two differ
The most material structural difference between these two Mercer funds lies in their portfolio composition and income orientation, despite both sharing an identical growth-assets allocation of 52.35% and the same risk indicator of 4. The Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund's name signals an ESG-screened approach, while the Mercer Income Generator Fund is positioned around income-generating assets — a distinction reflected clearly in their top holdings. The Income Generator's five largest positions include Auckland International Airport, an iShares MBS ETF, Infratil, and a New Zealand Government Bond maturing 2029, pointing toward yield-focused, infrastructure-heavy and fixed-income exposures. By contrast, the Responsible Balanced Fund's top holdings skew toward global growth equities — Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft — alongside New Zealand names Fisher & Paykel Healthcare and Infratil.
Both funds are managed by Mercer, sit under the same PDS, carry a risk indicator of 4, and are classified as Diversified. The Responsible Balanced Fund is larger at approximately NZD 28.4 million versus the Income Generator's NZD 20.7 million. On fees, the Income Generator charges 1.28% per annum against the Responsible Balanced Fund's 1.25%. The five-year return differential is notable: 3.52% annually for the Responsible Balanced Fund versus 2.47% for the Income Generator, though past returns do not indicate future performance.
Always verify current fees, returns, and holdings against each fund's product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on any figures here.
Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.
What's different at a glance
- Annual fund charges are within 0.05% of each other (1.28% vs 1.25%).
- Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
- Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund applies responsible-investment / ESG screening. The other fund does not.
Where each fund sits in its cohort
Percentile rank vs all 67 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.
Annual fund charge
Lower is better
Mercer
1.28%
Highest 23% of cohort
Mercer
1.25%
Highest 25% of cohort
5-year return p.a.
Past performance — not a predictor
Mercer
2.47%
Lower half over 5 years
Mercer
3.52%
Upper half over 5 years
Fund size
Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Mercer
NZ$21m
Lower half by size
Mercer
NZ$28m
Lower half by size
| Metric | Mercer | Mercer | Lower / higher is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual fund charge | 1.28% | 1.25% | Lower is better |
| Risk indicator (1–7) | 4 | 4 | Higher = more volatility |
| 5-year return p.a. | 2.47% | 3.52% | Higher is better (past not future) |
| Fund size | NZ$21m | NZ$28m | Larger = more stable, lower close-risk |
| Growth / income split | 53% / 47% | 53% / 47% | More growth = higher long-run return + volatility |
| NZ tax structure | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE (PIR-capped) | PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return. |
| Currency hedging | — | — | Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost. |
| Responsible investment screening | No | Yes | Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO. |
| Available via | Direct | Direct | Platforms accepting retail subscriptions. |
Portfolio overlap
How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.
Matching holdings
3
of each fund's top 10
Mercer weight in shared
10.9%
of Mercer Income Generator Fund top 10 is shared
Mercer weight in shared
4.5%
of Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund top 10 is shared
| Holding | Mercer | Mercer |
|---|---|---|
 Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited NZ | 5.03% | 2.06% |
 Infratil Limited NZ | 2.66% | 1.33% |
 Auckland International Airport Limited NZ | 3.20% | 1.15% |
"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.
What each fund says it does
Mercer
Mercer Income Generator Fund
The fund aims to provide a gross fixed monthly income in excess of bank deposit rates, along with a positive return on capital over the long term. To achieve this, the fund invests in a diversified mix of growth and defensive assets, with a focus on reliable income generation. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the underlying investment managers’ investment processes. The fund aims to maximise the amount of the monthly distribution payments to investors by outperforming, over the medium term, the weighted average return of tFull Mercer Mercer Income Generator Fund profile →
Mercer
Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund
The fund is a diversified portfolio with a slightly higher allocation to a mix of growth assets (e.G., shares & listed property) relative to a mix of income assets (e.G., cash & fixed interest). The fund is managed to include specific additional responsible exclusion criteria which aims to avoid investments in certain companies or activities & is managed with reference to ESG factors and has some exposure to investment strategies targeting sustainability themes. This fund has additional exclusions applied as described in our Sustainable Investment Policy and has bFull Mercer Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund profile →
Documents
Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →
Common questions
What's the difference between the Mercer Income Generator Fund and the Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund?
Which fund has lower fees, Mercer Income Generator Fund or Mercer Responsible Balanced Fund?
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Does either fund apply responsible-investment screening?
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
