Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Diversified

Mercer Income Generator FundvsSBS Wealth Balanced Strategy

Both are Diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

How much do these two overlap?

They hold 14 of the same securities. If you held both, roughly 7.7% of your money would be in the same companies — so the diversification you get from holding the pair is smaller than holding two funds suggests.

7.7%
Shared holdingMercer IncomeSBS WealthMin weight
Fisher & Paykel Healthcare5.03%1.36%1.36%
Contact Energy2.01%0.98%0.98%
Infratil2.66%0.93%0.93%
Auckland International Airport3.20%0.75%0.75%
Ebos1.04%0.64%0.64%
Mercury NZ0.99%0.57%0.57%
Spark New Zealand0.90%0.57%0.57%
Mainfreight1.09%0.45%0.45%
Summerset Group0.49%0.36%0.36%
Kiwi Property Group0.34%0.29%0.29%

Min weight is the smaller of the two weightings — if you hold both funds, that is the floor of your exposure to that position. Direct holdings only: anything either fund holds through an underlying fund or ETF is not counted, so the real overlap can only be higher. From each fund's FMA Disclose full portfolio filing.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their portfolio construction approach. The Mercer Income Generator Fund holds individual securities directly — its top positions include Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Corporation Limited (5.03%), Auckland International Airport Limited (3.20%), and Infratil Limited (2.66%), alongside bond instruments such as the iShares MBS ETF and a New Zealand Government Bond maturing 2029. The SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy takes a fund-of-funds approach, allocating through third-party managed funds: Dimensional Global Sustainability PIE Fund NZD Hedged dominates at 21.34%, followed by Harbour NZ Core Fixed Interest Fund (14.37%) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF NZD Hedged (11.16%), with a visible sustainability and ESG tilt across its holdings.

Despite this structural divergence, both funds sit at risk indicator 4 on the standard 1–7 scale and carry an identical growth asset allocation of 53.15%, placing them in broadly comparable risk territory within the Diversified category.

On fees, the Mercer fund charges 1.28% annually versus SBS Wealth's 1.03% — a 25-basis-point difference that compounds materially over time. On performance, Mercer discloses a five-year annualised return of 2.47%; SBS Wealth's five-year return figure is not available in this snapshot, so direct historical performance comparison cannot be made. Fund sizes are similar: Mercer at approximately NZD 20.7 million and SBS Wealth at approximately NZD 17.1 million.

Readers should verify all figures against each fund's current Product Disclosure Statement and latest Quarterly Fund Update on FMA Disclose before relying on any of this information.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy charges 0.25% lower in annual fund charges (1.03% vs 1.28%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 68 diversified funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mercer

1.28%

Highest 23% of cohort

SBS Wealth

1.03%

Upper half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mercer

2.47%

Lower half over 5 years

SBS Wealth

—

—

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mercer

NZ$21m

Lower half by size

SBS Wealth

NZ$17m

Lower half by size

MetricMercerSBS WealthLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.28%1.03%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)44Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.2.47%—Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$21mNZ$17mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split53% / 47%53% / 47%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

What each fund says it does

Mercer

Mercer Income Generator Fund

The fund aims to provide a gross fixed monthly income in excess of bank deposit rates, along with a positive return on capital over the long term. To achieve this, the fund invests in a diversified mix of growth and defensive assets, with a focus on reliable income generation. Environmental, Social and Governance characteristics are integrated into the underlying investment managers’ investment processes. The fund aims to maximise the amount of the monthly distribution payments to investors by outperforming, over the medium term, the weighted average return of t
Full Mercer Mercer Income Generator Fund profile →

SBS Wealth

SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy

The Strategy aims to achieve medium capital growth and returns over the medium to long term, with an emphasis on balancing capital growth with stable returns. The Strategy invests into the following SBS Wealth funds: 45% into the World Equity Portfolio; 15% into the Australasian Equity Portfolio; 25% into the World Bond Portfolio; and 15% into the New Zealand Bond Portfolio.
Full SBS Wealth SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Mercer logo

Mercer

Live

Last verified 2026-05-08

SBS Wealth logo

SBS Wealth

Not yet crawled. View fund page for FMA Disclose link.

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mercer Income Generator Fund and the SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy?
Both are diversified funds available to NZ retail investors. SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy charges 0.25% lower in annual fund charges (1.03% vs 1.28%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mercer Income Generator Fund or SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy?
SBS Wealth Balanced Strategy has the lower annual fund charge (1.03% p.a. vs 1.28% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.