Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Mint Australasian Equity FundvsNZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares

Mint Australasian Equity Fund (fund size NZ$198.8 million, annual fund charge 1.18%) and NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares (fund size NZ$194.3 million, annual fund charge 2.52%) are both Australasian equities managed funds, as shown on Sorted Smart Investor on 22 May 2026; Mint Australasian Equity Fund's 1-year return after fees and tax was −3.73% for the year to 31 March 2026, per its quarterly fund update filed on FMA Disclose.

Where you can buy these

Platform availability confirmed within the last 180 days. This is a statement of availability, not a recommendation — ManagedFundsNZ is not a Financial Advice Provider. Check the current PDS before investing.

Mint Australasian Equity Fund

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares

No platform availability confirmed. Usually means it is bought directly from the manager — check their site.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their asset allocation. The Mint Australasian Equity Fund holds 98.31% in growth assets, making it a near-pure equity vehicle, while NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares sits at 78.48% growth assets — a meaningful gap that suggests the NZ Funds portfolio carries a more blended composition, though the data does not itemise what fills the remaining 21.52%.

Annual fund charges diverge sharply: Mint discloses 1.18% versus NZ Funds' 2.52%, a difference of 1.34 percentage points that compounds materially over time. Both carry a risk indicator of 5 on the standard 1–7 scale. The five-year return figures run in the opposite direction: NZ Funds returned 4.59% per annum against Mint's 0.30%, though past returns are not a reliable indicator of future performance and the periods covered by each fund's quarterly fund update should be confirmed before drawing conclusions.

Portfolio construction also differs. Mint is notably concentrated, with Fisher & Paykel Healthcare alone at 17.65% and the top five holdings accounting for roughly 52% of the fund. NZ Funds shows tighter top-holding weights, with its five largest positions each sitting between 5.21% and 5.99%, suggesting broader diversification within the portfolio. Fund sizes are comparable — Mint at approximately NZD 198.8 million, NZ Funds at approximately NZD 194.3 million.

Verify all figures against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on this summary for any investment decision.

Comparison generated 2026-07-05 from each fund's FMA Disclose QFU facts as at that date. If the underlying facts change, this narrative is withheld until it is regenerated — the tables on this page always reflect the current data.

What's different at a glance

  • Mint Australasian Equity Fund charges 1.34% lower in annual fund charges (1.18% vs 2.52%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 57 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mint

1.18%

Highest 24% of cohort

NZ Funds

2.52%

Highest 3% of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mint

0.30%

Bottom 18% over 5 years

NZ Funds

4.59%

Upper half over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mint

NZ$199m

Largest 18% in cohort

NZ Funds

NZ$194m

Largest 22% in cohort

MetricMintNZ FundsLower / higher is
Annual fund charge1.18%2.52%Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7)55Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a.0.30%4.59%Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund sizeNZ$199mNZ$194mLarger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split98% / 2%78% / 22%More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structurePIE (PIR-capped)PIE (PIR-capped)PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging——Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screeningNoNoSpecific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available viaDirectDirectPlatforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

Matching holdings

3

of each fund's top 10

Mint weight in shared

13.3%

of Mint Australasian Equity Fund top 10 is shared

NZ Funds weight in shared

15.2%

of NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares top 10 is shared

HoldingMintNZ Funds
Mainfreight LtdMainfreight LtdNZ
5.21%5.45%
Summerset Group Holdings LtdSummerset Group Holdings LtdNZ
4.57%4.80%
A2 Milk Company LtdA2 Milk Company LtdNZ
3.56%4.98%

"Min weight" = the smaller of the two weights — a conservative read of how much exposure you'd have to that position if you held both funds.

What each fund says it does

Mint

Mint Australasian Equity Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in Australasian equities and targets medium to long-term growth. The Fund is benchmarked against the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index with an investment objective of outperforming the benchmark after fees and expenses over the medium to long term.
Full Mint Mint Australasian Equity Fund profile →

NZ Funds

NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares

The objective of the New Zealand and Australian Shares fund is to grow your investment over the long term by investing in growth assets and other authorised assets with active management. The fund is anticipated to mainly own and trade New Zealand and Australian shares over the minimum suggested timeframe.
Full NZ Funds NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mint Australasian Equity Fund and the NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Mint Australasian Equity Fund charges 1.34% lower in annual fund charges (1.18% vs 2.52%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mint Australasian Equity Fund or NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares?
Mint Australasian Equity Fund has the lower annual fund charge (1.18% p.a. vs 2.52% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Mint Australasian Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.30% and NZ Funds New Zealand and Australian Shares's is 4.59% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
→
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.