Skip to main content
ManagedFunds.nz

Fund-vs-fund · Australasian Equities

Mint Australasian Equity Fund vs Smart Australian Top 20 ETF

Both are Australasian Equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Numbers below are sourced from the FMA Disclose register via Sorted Smart Investor and reflect the latest published quarterly fund updates.

Why these two differ

The most material structural difference between these two funds is their investment mandate and resulting geographic exposure. The Mint Australasian Equity Fund is an actively managed, New Zealand-focused equity fund, with its top five holdings all being NZ-listed companies — Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Infratil, Auckland International Airport, Meridian Energy, and Contact Energy. The Smart Australian Top 20 ETF, managed by Smartshares, is a passive index-tracking fund concentrated in Australia's twenty largest listed companies, with its top holdings dominated by the big four Australian banks and BHP Group. Both funds sit in the same Australasian Equities category and share an identical risk indicator of 5 and an identical growth assets allocation of 98.31%, but the geographic tilt and active-versus-passive construction differ substantially.

On fees, Mint charges an annual fund charge of 1.19% against Smartshares' 0.60%, a difference of 59 basis points that compounds over time. On five-year returns as reported in each fund's latest Quarterly Fund Update, the Smartshares fund returned 10.37% per annum against Mint's 0.24% per annum — though these figures reflect the period covered by each respective QFU snapshot and investors should note that past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Fund sizes are broadly comparable: Mint at NZD 222.2 million and Smartshares at NZD 194.8 million. Neither fund is listed as a KiwiSaver scheme account option in the data provided here.

Always verify these details against each fund's current product disclosure statement and latest quarterly fund update on FMA Disclose before relying on them for any investment decision.

Cached comparison generated 2026-05-21 from each fund's latest FMA Disclose QFU. Regenerated when the underlying facts change.

What's different at a glance

  • Smart Australian Top 20 ETF charges 0.58% lower in annual fund charges (0.60% vs 1.18%).
  • Both are New Zealand PIE funds — investor tax is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.

Where each fund sits in its cohort

Percentile rank vs all 58 australasian equities funds we've matched on Sorted Smart Investor. Mechanical only — no opinion, no forward-looking view.

Annual fund charge

Lower is better

Mint

1.18%

Highest 23% of cohort

Smartshares

0.60%

Lower half of cohort

5-year return p.a.

Past performance — not a predictor

Mint

0.30%

Bottom 17% over 5 years

Smartshares

10.25%

Top 7% over 5 years

Fund size

Larger = more stable, lower close-risk

Mint

NZ$199m

Largest 16% in cohort

Smartshares

NZ$209m

Largest 13% in cohort

Metric Mint Smartshares Lower / higher is
Annual fund charge 1.18% 0.60% Lower is better
Risk indicator (1–7) 5 5 Higher = more volatility
5-year return p.a. 0.30% 10.25% Higher is better
(past not future)
Fund size NZ$199m NZ$209m Larger = more stable, lower close-risk
Growth / income split 98% / 2% 98% / 2% More growth = higher long-run return + volatility
NZ tax structure PIE (PIR-capped) PIE (PIR-capped) PIE = simpler. FIF = annual return.
Currency hedging Hedged smooths NZD/foreign FX moves at a small cost.
Responsible investment screening No No Specific exclusions live in each fund's SIPO.
Available via Direct Direct Platforms accepting retail subscriptions.

Portfolio overlap

How many top-10 positions both funds hold, and at what weight. Computed from each fund's most recently disclosed top-10 holdings — exact-name matched (Microsoft Corp. = Microsoft Corporation), with a Cash / Cash & Equivalents collapse rule.

0 overlapping top-10 holdings. The two funds disclose disjoint top-10 sets — useful diversification signal if you held both.

What each fund says it does

Mint

Mint Australasian Equity Fund

The Fund invests predominantly in Australasian equities and targets medium to long-term growth. The Fund is benchmarked against the S&P/NZX 50 Gross Index with an investment objective of outperforming the benchmark after fees and expenses over the medium to long term.
Full Mint Mint Australasian Equity Fund profile →

Smartshares

Smart Australian Top 20 ETF

The Smart Australian Top 20 ETF is designed to track the return (before tax, fees and other expenses) of the S&P/ASX 20 Index. The Index is comprised of 20 of the largest companies listed on the ASX.
Full Smartshares Smart Australian Top 20 ETF profile →

Documents

Crawled directly from each manager's website. How we record provenance →

Common questions

What's the difference between the Mint Australasian Equity Fund and the Smart Australian Top 20 ETF?
Both are australasian equities funds available to NZ retail investors. Smart Australian Top 20 ETF charges 0.58% lower in annual fund charges (0.60% vs 1.18%).
Which fund has lower fees, Mint Australasian Equity Fund or Smart Australian Top 20 ETF?
Smart Australian Top 20 ETF has the lower annual fund charge (0.60% p.a. vs 1.18% p.a.). Source: each fund's most recent Quarterly Fund Update on the FMA Disclose register.
How do the 5-year returns compare?
Mint Australasian Equity Fund's 5-year return p.a. is 0.30% and Smart Australian Top 20 ETF's is 10.25% (after fees, before tax). Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
Are both funds PIE-taxed in NZ?
Yes. Both are NZ Portfolio Investment Entities (PIEs). Investor tax on the fund's income is capped at the Prescribed Investor Rate (PIR), maximum 28%.
Where can I read the official documents for these funds?
Both funds publish their Product Disclosure Statement (PDS), Statement of Investment Policy (SIPO) and Quarterly Fund Update (QFU) on the FMA Disclose register at disclose-register.companiesoffice.govt.nz. Always read the current PDS before investing.
FinanceAdvisers.co.nz logo
Not sure which fund is right for you?
Find a financial adviser on FinanceAdvisers.co.nz
Browse NZ-licensed financial advice providers and search by speciality, location and review.
Important: This comparison is general information only — not personalised financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. The right fund for you depends on your personal circumstances. Read each fund's Product Disclosure Statement and consider speaking to a licensed financial adviser.